Poll: Who has the advantage in the race right now, Obama or Romney?
-
Tue Oct 9, 2012 7:37 PM EDT
— Filed under: poll
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |
President Obama has the advantage in the race. He has been winning by 10 or so points all along. After the 1st debate, people just wanted to wake him up, as such the winning points are less. After VP Biden debates and the Presidents next 2 debates, president will increase his winning margin by more points. We need President Obama in white house for 4 more years.
Indeed we do, Sen. Obama will come out on top as usual. He's far too smart for Romney.
Romney, can say what he wants. No sane person will listen to him any more. Only the corrupt could tolerate all his lies and mistaken causes.
Early voting opens at the county courthouse here tomorrow. I plan to be there to vote for OBAMA/BIDEN......On the day of election I will be an authorized poll watcher.
Obama will hopefully win the race, but right now Romney has the momentum, in large part due to the unprecedented number of "low information voters (read- STUPID PEOPLE). I am still hopeful that Obama has had the wake-up call he needed to whip his campaign into high gear.
Sen, KV, yes we need president to win and he WILL! I was listening to (as usual in my car on the road trip) Hateful Hannity and boy he was talking like he was having heart attack or may be baby! Between him and that fat boy Limbo I don't know who is more devilish! I have never seen so called christains acting like Devils! They hate president so much that they are ready to cross their christianity , which they never had it! Now that another Bit** Coulter is on Momoney Romoney's side! She hated him but now he is her man! that is how these republicats work! They have no morals!
Of course the only 1 that makes any reasonable sense what-so-ever , someone that stays on a single track and focused and does not jump the rails from minute to minute - President Obama !
Just like Tricky dicky (Nixon) used to say " run as a conservative in primaries and run as a middle of the road " as his new policy. all of a sudden Romoney is running as a moderate republicat! He avoided that label in the begining and called him self as a "severely conservative"! But now like a camelian he has changed his color!
@ 1.1 Kv ; 1.2 Thankful Mom; 1.4 Mac : I agree. Thankful mom-GOPs will try to rig and suppress voters any way they can. Please raise your voice when you are at the polling place when notice anything they are doing wrong.
We need President Obama for 4 more years.
If you're thinking about voting for Obama, but in doubt, you may want to do it before the next debate. That way you can use the too dumb to know any better excuse.
At this moment I am sorry to say Romney has the ball and is driving down field.Obama needs to get the ball back or force Romney to punt.Romney has been known to fumble. Obama needs to channel his enthusiasm he shows speaking to the crowds into the debate.If Romney lies he needs to call him out on it.If Romney buts in Obama needs to do the same.Obama needs to show he is angryHe is human.Screw if people think he is an angry black man because he really should be.Romney just looked good because he wasn't surrounded by a bunch of wing nuts in the last debate.Go Obama /Biden win this for the people.
Mac...
Super Chameleon
It's not fair......
Obama Supporters: President Should Have Teleprompter At Debates
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAYDCQLdSeY
six is that what happened to you for Bush? Mission Accomplished!
David way too cool! And just like Woolard he's a shady charter!
Jimmy Carter vs. Ronald Reagan - Liberals Wrong AGAIN!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhkL-mji9UE
There is one major law Obama signed that if Romney says he will repeal this one certain law it will all but secure a Romney victory.I won't say what this law is for I don't want Romney to win. Maybe Obama will beat him to it and admit he made a mistake and promise to repael this certain law himself.
DESPERATE DEMOCRATS DENY DENVER DEBACLE.
From the number and tone of the seeds posted on NV, I conclude the Democrats are afraid that Romney is ahead.
Romney will lie, cheat an steal, to become President. He is a dangerous person.
I pitty you! VP Biden should asl Crying Ryin " can I call you kid?". Cry baby ryin need his mom on his side to console him!
@xxx ooo
6pik has been drinkin his wacky tea containing that "brain-eating amoeba", which results in destruction of brain cells leaving tea drinker without his marbles and all common sense. Poor 6pik
Ahh... I see harry is most likely another wacky tea drinker. At least 6pik has company in his mindless upsurdity.
@DScully,
And you've been drinking that Kool-Aid, which results in thinking that President Obama is too 'Kool' to loose re-election.
DScully.....did six attack you personally? NO.....So why are you? Attack his point not the person......Thanks....
If he has been nasty to you in the past....then I retract my statement....but I know six to be a very nice person and I have my doubts that he has ever been nasty to you.
I've been reading on these blogs long enough to realize Obama hs it in the bag. And that was before his blow out unemployment numbers that shows he has master the economy...
With the debate the advantage slipped from Obama to Romney... Which leaves me worried, outraged and bewildered..... But what I think is really wrong is that Romney's now in reach of winning the election based on lies he made in the debate. I am afraid the middle class may cut their own throats based on Romney's lies. This is just wrong! There is a lot of anger out here. Romney tapped into that with his aggressive attitude allowed his lies and spin to work in his favor.
I think people are angry and we want to know that Obama has our back! The fight in Romney is appealing to the anger and frustration people are feeling. They need to realize that Romney will continue the Republican policy's that put us here. We can't afford for them to do us more harm!
Ahhhh.... more wacky tea drinkers to the rescue. Unfortunately, all of your troll brains are too far gone to have one sensible idea between you. You have all been infected by... Obama derangement syndrome
http://soundcloud.com/mike-in-raleigh/obama-derangement-syndrome
Now a song for you all to enjoy...
@!$%#s on the Right
http://soundcloud.com/mike-in-raleigh/@!$%#s-on-the-right
@Sheryl
Don't worry... Obama still has a huge lead among women and minorities, such as blacks and hispanics. Being more intelligent and evolved than white men, we are much more inclined to vote for our best interests instead of being led by our fears and prejudices. Right!
Blacks And Whites, Latins
http://soundcloud.com/mike-in-raleigh/blacks-and-whites-latins
LOL....six and tap venture to the first page and meet DS. Too cool. ROTFFL. Phony dem, no body is going to stay home and so don't be takeing anyone here for stupid.
Hey.... here's a special message for the conservatives FROM SOMEONE WHO HAS THE SAME SELFISH VIEWS AS YOU, MUTT ROBME, AND LYIN RYAN.
Do LIBERALS have it right, or are they just a bunch of idiots?
I have claimed to be an independent, a frustrated independent, but actually I am an angry and very selfish individual who really didn't know what he supported until today. For those who have read my most recent articles I wish to offer an apology… I have been angry with a system of which I really knew nothing about.
I grew up in a small Southern city where the kids made fun of me for being poor, for having clothes with holes and stains, for old and faded shoes, for being different and unlikable by their standards. I hated being poor more than anything and used that energy to excel in academics. I finished college, medical school and residency and then went into private practice. Within just under a few years I was doubling annually what Mr. Obama considers the minimum gross salary to be considered rich. I never looked back… until recently.
Out of fear of losing a "portion" of what I felt was rightfully mine, I have suppressed an inner-voice that has been telling there is a better way for everyone and not just for me. So what if I grew up poor and so what if I worked my ass off to overcome my previous level in life… society needs us, begs us to contribute to the common good. Why? Because what is good for those at the lowest level is good for us all.
Some would argue that I deserve every penny I make, because of all the training and sacrifices I made to get to where I am today. They would argue that those at the bottom deserve their current station in life because they are lazy, ignorant or criminals. I used to agree with them until today. Last night, I finished reading an article on the site The Harvard Political Review called Liberalism versus Socialism by Adam Kern.
Please stay with me because I'm really "green" on all of this and please understand this is coming from the heart first and mind second. I have had it wrong. Liberalism, at least to me, is not about punishing or taking advantage of the rich. It is more about understanding that for a society to really work, and for everyone to have a decent shot at creating something better for themselves, then there needs to be some pre-set standard by which the lowest level of folks can live and prosper. This of course should include and not be limited to healthcare, housing, food stamps and expenses for education. To my conservative friends, if you're not seeing red yet, then keep reading.
There was a link at the bottom of the web page of Liberalism verses Socialism to a book written by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett. The book is titled The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. I read it from cover to cover today and it was an eye-opener. This may be a news flash to some and it was to me, but did you ever consider that the poor, unemployed and/or disabled suffer from not only financial constraints but from depression, low self-esteem, and just out right despair? Many folks come off as demanding and ungrateful, and I'm sure there is a small minority who are ungrateful or who abuse the system, but the majority are not that way. They are suffering and some seek easy means of relief such as bad habits and addiction, unwanted pregnancies and crime.
So what does that mean for America? I believe we have set our standards too low. I believe we are not doing enough to help those at the bottom. The "worst off" folks in America should be living at level that doesn't result in despair, that doesn't leave them depressed and hopeless. They should, at least, be thinking about a productive and promising future and not living at a level that is responsible for most of them staying at that level. It's not that they have too much and are content with it. They have too little and the majority are just unable to "break free." They cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel because they are too far from it.
The book makes the argument that if we raise the standards for benefits for the poor, disabled and unemployed then society will reap benefits as well. It argues that there will be many more folks rising above their current conditions and becoming productive members of society. They will be happier and more secure. Crime, bad habits and unwanted pregnancies will go down and less folks will need assistance. Instead of "trapping" them there, we will actually being giving them a fair chance to move on. And for those who can't work, the disabled and/or elderly, then they will at least have a much brighter future than the one that exists today.
To answer the question to the title "Do LIBERALS have it right, or are they just a bunch of idiots?" I would have to say yes, they do have it right and I'm the one that has been an idiot! There is so much more I could write, like what does this mean for tax-payers and corporations and so on. But, I believe this is enough for now. Thanks for reading it. Peace! :)
Oh... I guess I should have warned you, he's a "former SELFISH IDIOT". Maybe you all should give what he has to say some consideration and take off the idiot hat.
http://mancave.newsvine.com/_news/2012/10/07/14278188-do-liberals-have-it-right-or-are-they-just-a-bunch-of-idiots
@Thankful Mom-3182614, RE: Comment #1.2
Unfortunately, it's not only the corrupt and/or insane for Romney (and the conspiracy-theorists: Birthers, etc, who don't believe Obama is Constitutionally qualified to be President). While you might argue that those who hate Obama are insane, and will be mostly correct, there's another category to be concerned about.
There are enough people out there for Romney because they don't trust Obama. While we would both likely agree that most people who distrust Obama somehow misunderstand him, for any number of reasons, nevertheless there are those who are pro-Romney because they trust that he is like them: Greedy, not an economic patriot, use tax havens as much as possible, etc. While immoral, those people are still rational.
Then, there are those who don't trust Obama because they consider him a socialist, a la Robin Hood, but unjustified in redistributing wealth to those who don't deserve it for whatever reason.
While we would argue that they are misguided, since its currently the rich who are benefitting from a Reverse-Robin-Hood redistribution due to an unjustifiable belief that the rich will create jobs given an unconditional tax break, whereas the rational way to set up the tax code would be to conditionally allow for a tax deduction only after the new jobs have been created.
As I've said many times already, I'm convinced that if Romney were to be elected President, we'll have that double-dip into the 2nd Great Depression, in large part because that would most likely mean that the GOP would have a majority of the Senate in addition to the House. (Even more damaging would be all the Supreme Court nominations, slanting SCOTUS further towards a pro-Corporate bias.)
I should probably chime in here because I think Mitt Romney will get us all killed.
No sane person has ever threatened to bomb a nuclear country.
This video shows Mitt Romney threatening to bomb Iran after he discovers that they have nuclear technology AND long range cruise missiles (click here).
That is like urinating on a wall socket.
Iran started one nuclear power plant last year and is planning another because Bush failed to stop the Soviets in 2007. A heavy water reactor will be completed next year which does not require centrifuges (click here).
Spent fuel is chemically process spent nuclear fuel rods to get plutonium to make a-bombs (centrifuges not required) (click here).
Iran tested a type of long range sea-based cruse missile system in January (click here).
Egypt launched one of those Iranian cruise missile into Israel yesterday (click here).
A Republican-backed coup in 1953 replaced the democratically elected government of Iran with a US-backed dictatorship allowing British Petroleum to "steal oil" when several hundred influential Muslims were murdered (click here).
Iran HATES Israel, Britain and the United States.
They are not going to get over it.
And Romney is busy beating on the nest like a moron that does not know about hornets.
dem4romney34......
Look at California.... The Republicans are up to their old tricks.....!!!!!!!!
I remember The republicans doing a number on California, just like now, once before. I remember California having a healthy surplus. It was under Pet Willson that the power companies were deregulated. That let in companies like Enron to game the system and drive prices for energy sky high. But by then Pet Willson was out of office and Gray Davis was put in the position of having to keep the power on. California was being held up big time by companies like Enron who were gaming the system. Mean while president Bush told Gray Davis that it was a Calif problem. It wasn't until the balance of power changed in the Senate that Calif got any co-operation from washington. Our surplus was being used up, stollen, to keep the lights on, and everything in the state with power. Bushes good buddy CEO, Kenneth Lay, at Enron had put us in the dark and in the hole. Of course Gray Davis being forced by circumstances, caused by the republican agenda to deregulate, needed to raise money with a tax.... On vehicles I believe. The people just didn't connect the dots back to deregulation of the power industry, the theft of our surplus was enabled by the republicans.
Yes they did a number on us..... Shame! I remember paying skyrocketing utility the bills. That's when I found out what the republicans would do for you. It's a listen to keep in mind. Now they are trying it again. This time it won't work. We know who is to blame!
Romney keeps blaming Obama on the economy but fails to mention which policies are at fault.
Ok CONS, let's do some ARITHMETIC...
First,
Name the “Obama” POLICIES and the AMOUNTS that you say added trillions to the debt.
Next,
ADD the total amounts and DEDUCT from the current $16 TRILLION.
The balance = GOP spending.
Remember the following…
Expenses to FIX the GOP failed policies like TARP and the stimulus are still GOP spending and NOT Obama's fault so DO NOT count those policies.
All expenses from the previous GOP administration’s unfunded policies that Obama added to his budget is also Republican spending.
INTEREST on the GOP TRILLIONS of debt is NOT for Obama to be responsible for either, it is GOP spending too. They own that interest.
Also,
The Bailouts are LOANS to “repair” more GOP screwed up policies, the GOP wanted those to be FREE of charge, a ”going away gift” to the Banks and Wall Street, from Bush.
Do not add policies before Reagan because there was NO DEBT PROBLEM before that, Reagan took office when the debt had ONE TRILLION and could have been tackled and fixed with comprehensive tax reform but he did not.
Entitlements are a tiny fraction of the debt and they always bring their own revenues thru payroll deductions as premium payments. Entitlements are NOT free, it’s paid into insurance.
Saying that the Democrats had a “majority” doesn't count either, because we all know the filibustering, obstructing, uncompromising, DO NOTHING GOP party of pledges to “NEVER bring revenues” has had the “CONTROL” and all those failed GOP policies were drafted by Republicans AND all those policies passed with GOP majorities of votes going back to Reagan.
The CONS will NEVER have policies or numbers to blame on the Democrats because they DO NOT exist. Look them up, I tried. Every single policy at fault are GOP owned, drafted and vigorously voted by them.
DO NOT get fooled into thinking it is Obama’s or the Democrat’s fault. It is time to stop that Myth.
Get ready. All you will get from the Republican Fox-Rush-bots is going to be more diversions and ridicules to change the subject, so be prepared for those.
This is NOT blaming the GOP or BUSH, this is ARITHMETIC !!!!
LOL
wrong!!!!
not even a good try.
seen this feel to the bottom not talking about 1.35
"Saying that the Democrats had a “majority” doesn't count either,"
so true as the Democrats super majority was only 47 days. funny they seem to forget really simple facts.
That's where CONTROL and MAJORITY differ.
If a majority cannot pass legislation because the minority filibusters them...
Who has the control?
Well, dem, there are many black people I know. I taught school for year and made many black friends. I also go to a Christian Church who are not elites and we are diverse in the fact that we look at people as just that, PEOPLE. We don't judge them for the lives they live or the color of their skin. We all meet together as a family to serve God, not bigots. But we'd take a bigot and try to teach him to live as Jesus lived. We are patient and loving to all. You are wrong to think that your or my color has anything to do with it. Your are also wrong on how people think about Gays. Maybe you just mix with the wrong people.
Again.....There is not ONE REASON to vote for romney. His is a fake puppet of the republican party, trying to hard to please too many and telling lies to accomplish what he hopes they want to hear from him. Putz.
dem4romney34.......
Republican, Ronald Reagan was the 33rd governor of California two-terms(1967–75).Â
Jerry Brown, (Democrat), served as Governor between 1975 and 1983, and again currently.Â
George Deukmejian was a Republican and served as the governor two-terms (1983–1991).Â
Pete Wilson, (Republican), was elected governor to succeed outgoing two-term Republican governor Deukmejian. Wilson then served as the 36th governor of Calif. two-terms(1991–1999).Â
Gray Davis was a Democrat and served as governor from 1999 until 2003.Â
Schwarzenegger, (Republican), came into office October 7, 2003, in a special recall election. He then served two-terms, until 2011.
Pet Wilson was the driving force behind the 1996 legislation that deregulated the state's energy market, which was the first energy utilities deregulation in the U.S. and aggressively pushed by companies such as Enron.
The date of the legislation that deregulated the state's energy market was in 1996... when the Republicans were in charge......
Come on own up to it. The Republicans have had deregulation, tort reform, downsizing the social safety net on their agenda, along time. Their agenda has done a lot of damage to our state, our country, and beyond. The Republicans are so owned by the very rich and influential, that they will take us right back to fulfilling their agenda that created the mess in the first place.
Those wealthy at the top, gaming our economic system, made a lot while encouraging the working class to subsidize their stagnate wages with housing bubble feed credit..... At least until the bubble burst. All the wealth is at the top, and they just can't get enough. We arn't going away, even if you republicans get your way on your greedy agenda. Might be a lot of very angry people though.Â
dem4romney34......
You Republicans just can't stand for anyone to earn a living wage or have a decent retirement.... But you protect the wealthy gaining and hoarding as much as possible even at the demise of this country and most Americans. By the way California is a beautiful State. But I bet you never experienced the thick, heavy smog that burned your eyes and throat back before emission controll was put in place. I remember it back in the 1950's and 60's. I remember when it was to bad to spend time playing outside as a kid. I remember the 20 minute drive from LA county into LA City that took 2 hours by freeway. The smog was horrible..... But what would you care. Yes they are manipulating the market here in Calif for political purposes. It will backfire just as it did when the republicans deregulated the energy maket and let speculators and company's like Enron drive the prices up by taking refinery's off line, (for maintenance), creating a shortage. They won the round but lost the war. It taught we Californians just who and what the Republicans are. I learned the lesson well and won't forget. Now they have just reminded us.... LOL So save your breath... We got your number.... It's 666
Speaking of California, as no matter who is in charge, they are screwed up. What do you liberals think of CA passing stringent gasoline requirements, then as soon as those requirements cost them money, choose to relax them? Gosh- the environment is important until it cost liberals a buck...
Romney has the momentum and the truth on his side......Obama will have some explaining to do.....that is unless he get's "altitude sickness" again.
Truth and Mr Romney are mutually exclusive. 27 verifiable lies in 38 minutes.
Romney wouldn't know the truth if it was to slap him in the face and call him names.
Can you say one thing that Romney said that was true?
Let's just say it's not in the bag! LOL.
After the truth comes out about what happened in Benghazi, President Obama will have little chance of re-election. At least CBS is starting to cover the cover-up. Isn't the last debate on foreign policy?
I'm not saying it's in the bag, but I like Romney's chances a lot better this week than I did last week. It's a long time til election day.
The truth is on his side? Really? You call his lies truth. Repugnantcans are remarkably stupid.
His momentum is based on his lies at the debate.
These are sad times for democracy.
If Mitt is elected the country will be in big trouble.
Donald Wolc Jr, #2.3
I think he meant it when he said he enjoyed firing people. Look how excited he got about firing Jim Lehrer at the debate. It figures he'd go after PBS, the one channel I like besides MSNBC.
That's about it. I don't recall anything else he's said in the past 20 months that was true.
One of the MANY reasons I will vote for Obama.
Romney and the word truth is an oxymoron.
Suddenly Mitt R. got advise to lie as they are seeing that democrats policies definitely is unbeatable as such to change. So Mitt R, lied during the entire debate, that confused President Obama. But we all know that if he goes to white house he will change everything he said during his 1st debate and do what he is saying all along. American people are smart. We all will vote for President Obama.
looks like "true believer pat" has returned with his fantasies.
ok, pat let's play your game. romney has said his $4.80 trillion debt exploder tax cut for the rich will be paid for with closed loopholes. if that's true, you can list the loopholes and deductions that will be closed.
list them pat, if you can. if you can't you're tacitly admitting that romney has lied.
true patriot, pat? there's just as much truth in that name as there is in your and romney's statements.
willared and truth should not be used in the same sentence. He even claimed his first name was mitt not willard and that is on record.
Advised to lie? No, he just does it naturally.
If Romney told nothing but lies.....The President sure did a terrible job of exposing them.....maybe his defense was written on the tops of his shoes and he needs reading glasses or is it he had altitude sickness or maybe he was tired.......It couldn't have been that he got caught in his failed policies and lies and could not defend them.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/check-math-romneys-tax-plan-doesnt-raise-middle-class-taxes_653485.html
@TAP,
I heard today that the Obots think the President should have been able to use a teleprompter during the debate and future debates.
I feel Romney is one of the worst persons in the history of the United States to run for President Every time I see his lying face, I get ill, I thought
Bush was bad,I hated listening and watching him too, hard on the eyes, and ears.
Massachusetts, the state he governed doesn't want him. Most people are voting Republican on moral as well as economic issues, which the economic is a mute subject now. I feel Obama is leading, but narrowly but not as slim as the last race. I am worried about the polls however, and hoping there is no fraud counting the votes, never thought voting would turn so underhanded with tactics.Scary.............................
He just let him expose himself. 27 in 38 minutes is even a record for any liar.
You are pathetic with your teleprompter whine. Obama dose not need it. He just let him lie. How did he do it. He broke the rules of debate. Maybe if you have any knowledge of debates you will look at the tapes again and realize what distasteful, and frankly bully techniques mitt used. So, I will take the mild mannered crusader myself, anytime.
Not to change subject TAP, from what I was told low Sulphur, I was told damn near burning dirt!!, As you also know, The President will prevail,
ok, true believer pat, thanks for admitting that both you and romney are profligate liars. your reply is perhaps as naive and stupid as i would have expeced from a romney believer.
romney told so many flagrant lies that no one could believe it.
some of romney's lies: he didn't propose a $5 trillion tax cut (ok, $4.8 trillion rounded up); his healthcare plan covers pre-existing conditions; he's going to preserve medicare (vouchercare is not medicare); obama cut $716 billion from medicare; obama is removing work requirement from welfare, and so many more.
ok tbpat, let's see your proof that these are true.
hey, i see drillbaby is just as intelligent and honest as tbpat. drillbaby is also a flagrant and unrepentant liar.
@marvilus,
What did I lie about? Did I lie about CBS finally covering what really happened in Benghazi? Did I lie about Obama getting his hind end handed to him in the debate? Did I lie about Obama supporters thinking that Obama should be able to use a teleprompter during debates? What exactly did I lie about?
marvilus...I posted a refute to the $5 Trillion Dollar Tax lie...you just need to click on the link....as far as the $716 Billion from medicare...yea it is going to reduce the payments to providers....so when that happens do you think it will be easier or harder for people on medicare to find a doctor and or hospital that accepts the service.
hey, drillbaby, are you able to read your own post?
here, let me remind you: "I heard today that the Obots think the President should have been able to use a teleprompter during the debate and future debates."
who is obots? are you a liar?
TAP truth on his side? Show us his tax returns! Show us some truth huh?
Hey Sarge....good to see ya! Maybe the coal your talking about it Anthrocite instead of Bituminus....but Low Sulphur is the one that burns the cleanest...High Sulphur well puts out more Sulphur when burned and can create Sulphuric Acid. At least that is what I have heard on the subject.
Hey xxx....why should he show any more of his taxes....the only reason the left wants his taxes is .........to spin up more class warfare.....ie....Look at what that guy did to avoid paying taxes...that aint right....
If I was Romney I tell the media....the following...
If Obama provides the information on the Fast and Furious that Issa has requested I will provide 5 more years of tax returns.....If he provides his colledge transcripts ....you can have 5 more....and that would put an end to it....because Obama is hiding something in his transcripts that he does not want us to see and the same for Romneys taxes....
@marvilus,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/06/obama_supporters_president_should_have_teleprompter_at_debates.html
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/unfair-obama-supporters-explain-why-teleprompters-should-be-allowed-during-debates/
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/10/05/Obama-Supporters-President-Should-Have-Teleprompter-At-Debates
'Obots' is a term affectionately given to the robot-like people that blindly support Obama. Get it?
true believer pat, i don't click on links that could have viruses. just list the loopholes. that should be easy.
your answer to the $716 billion lie is absolutely stupid. here let me give you an example: a doctor decides not to treat medicare patients. is that because potus reduced prepayment for potentially unnecessary procedures?
your response about the $716 billion lie is ridiculous. i know that because it's right wing propaganda.
try giving a reasonable analytical explanation of the loss of benefits that aren't lost. and please, no right wing propaganda. show us your brain works.
so drillbaby, you just made it up, huh? that's not a lie?
keep tryin'.
and why should anyone believe what others say about who are obama supporters? could they be romney supporters misrepresenting themselves?
marvilus....you don't click on links....give me a break....do your own research....I wouldn't want you to get a virus...LOL
tb pat, your post #2.24, is a reprise of your lame defense of romney's non-disclosure of his tax returns. it doesn't hold up now as it didn't before.
romney said he never paid less that 13% in income taxes and anyone who paid more than was owed was not qualified to be president.
in his 2011 tax return he paid more taxes than he owed. so he's not qualified to be president by his own words.
had he paid only what he owed, he would have paid less than 10%, which makes his 13% claim another of his myriad lies.
he has no credibility where his taxes are concerned. if he wants anyone but dishonest lie condoners to trust him he has to prove he's trustworty.
let's see those tax returns!
you're not a very good romney lie defender, but you're a great romney lie condoner.
come on, tb pat. you can't list the loopholes because romney hasn't listed them. that makes him a liar and you a lie condoner.
a simple list will suffice. i can read very well.
You voted for Obama on Hope and Change in 2008.....so why are you demanding details now?
Wonder why these folks aren't calling out Obama on his lies. He was, in actuality, a liar.
Funny how words can come back to haunt you, isn't it marv? Like when Obama stated if he didn't have the bus on solid ground with a solid recovery in 3 years, he wouldn't deserve reelection?
I do agree with him on at least that point...
Well, India, my condolences that you lost your BFF but, I had to break the news.....sorry. The "cow" hasn't been nabbed yet even though it has been around much longer than PatricaHaynes(sp) but, here's good news.......my (other's) nemesis is gone......short timer and I might add less than the "ho-lee-pain-in-the-rear", IMO.
tyler
Texas Scarborough banned, User Agreement violation.
Mr. Schultz is a public figure but don't slander him in his online home, folks.
#2.15
- Tue Oct 9, 2012 12:25 PM PDT
ROTFFL.....LOL
If the cow is dreaming of being nabbed, we have taken all the fun out of his life by just ignoring his foolish prattle.The other news made my day. Thanks, Kathe.
Thank you Ms. Kathe from Tacoma!!!! He was another one I could easily live without! Made my day (night). Almost time for bed! I missed the post where he insulted Ed. I really hate it when they do that.
The cow is over the moon. I ignore the cow.
I am trying hard to get over losing my BFF. LOL
@TrueAmericanPat, DrillBaby, et. al.:
Romney lied.
Kindly forgive me for invading your conservative fantasy with these facts.
Romney knows his voting base all flunked math.
That is why he used all four of these talking points during the same debate.
It is mathematically impossible to do all four simultaneously.
Proof that Romney lied.
The debate was the first time Romney said all four Ayn Rand lies in the same venue, but he intentionally did not say all four during a single response to distract viewers.
That means he has been carefully coached about how to repeat this lie.
This kind of economic fantasy was made popular by a communist author named Ayn Rand after she migrated here from Russia. She wrote fantasy novels Atlas Shrugged and Fountainhead where actual math is replaced by magic that makes all her stuff unreadable for anyone that is intelligent.
Captain-Alzheimer's-the-racist-debate-moderator from PBS finally stopped Romney and asked him "did you really mean to say that" when Obama started staring at the podium in disgust after telling the moderator that this is mathematically impossible.
I suspect news organizations would have said Obama lost the debated if he turned to Romney, said "liar", and asked him to explain how he plans to do all four of these at the same time.
Well crackhead....I think you may have your facts a little skewed.....I don't believe Romney said he would not borrow money from China.....What I do remember is him saying something about cutting spending would be done the following way....."I will eliminate all programs by this test...if they don't pass it....I will ask this question...is the program so critical that it is worth borrowing money from China to pay for it".
Check into it crackhead....maybe your correct ....but I think you are wrong...
Also, I have already shown how Romney can cut tax rates by 20% and still be revenue neutral. You may ask what is the point of cutting tax rates if the revenue isn't going to change......well as Romney correctly stated....there are many small businesses that would benefit from this because many do not pay the corporate rate ...... they pay the individual rate.....this would help small businesses and create growth.....pretty good idea if you ask me.
President Obama has the advantage he's been ahead in the polls and after the first debate he needs to step it up and put his game face on and take down mitt romney
If you want a job next year you'll vote for Romney. If you want $10 gas, you'll vote for Obama.
If you want to be a corporate slave vote for Robme!
Romney is a dangerous person. Think twice, then again, and know who you are voting for, before you vote. Do we want someone that only cares for the fat cats, or someone who thinks about all of us?
xxx...so are all private sector jobs bad?
I'm not trying to give you a hard time xxx...I really did enjoy our chat the other day....I hope we have more like that...TAP
Hi, all !!
All that I've read and heard, it really doesn't matter who is POTUS. If this Country wants to only concern itself with the economy........that's short sited, IMO. The deficit, debt, big spending proposed by RobUS, tax cuts and foreign affairs need to be scutinized with a microscope. I mean it........these other are the difference between our success to remain a Nation with justice for all.
We can't afford more Bush nor on steroids. I believe that the race is still in Obama's favor despite the tie that I saw at the first debate.
Hi Kathe....always good to see you...did you really see a tie?
@Kathe,
If you saw a tie, you saw something that even the MSNBC crew didn't see. The MSNBC crew saw a shellacking by Romney. Even Chris Mathews, you know Mr. Tingly Leg, screamed Mitt Romney "was winning!!!!" After that beat down by Romney, all MSNBC had to come back with is "Romney Lied".
Please. Somebody call a Whaaaammbulance.
Hi, TAP!
I really did. In a nutshell, I saw a new Willard.....most everything he said was not what he's said before, except when he did say it before <s> plus a bit more that he will more than likely attempt to switch at the next debate, which is not so unusual except that he did it all at once and nearly became a Democrat.
Obama appeared a bit stunned even though he should have been aware ahead of time and prepared for Willard to pull a stunt like he did but, not being a strategist, I can't guess what it was really all about. The note taking is something that I would have done because now, in front of millions Americans, Willard has declared that these are his ideas this time.
Will watch the next debate and see what shakes out. Looking forward to the VP debates. Should be a bit more fun even though there's nothing funny about choosing a POTUS.........serious business to me and this election more than ever.
Hi Kathe, #3.8
Looks like the trolls are all gloating now. Suddenly they believe these "lying" polls! Imagine! I've got most of them on ignore. I have no stomach for Romney lovers. I despise the sob. He's dangerous. His VP is dangerous. If they win, God help this country.
Nassau looking better every day if they win. Isle of Man too far from my kids. I don't think I could take it if Romney wins. Any hope of a representative Democracy ended with Citizens United. This country is headed for big trouble if the GOP takes over. I don't want to live in a Plutocracy.
Kathe,
I wonder if TAP realizes that his hero, Ronald Reagan, would be put out of this race just like Jon Huntsman was. The T-Party would never elect Reagan. Hell, they'd never elect Bush!
They're slowly moving a bit to the left of Hitler. I noticed Romney's salute today. Arm straight up! Wonder if he'll eventually expect us to salute him back?
Hi Kathe India...just got done watching the debate of the two ND D/R(tp) candidates.
So Kathe does that now mean if I vote for Woolard and all the rest democrats it will be a straight ticket? <S> I knew Woolard would try to pull the sheepskin over the eyes of the uninformed & unaware. I thinking the second debate will no doubt bring more viewers.
Hey Kathe....Hey xxx....Hi India..
I think we all want what is best for our country.....we just have different ideas of how to get there....
I wish that we could get on here and argue about what type of Grape Produces the best wine....or why the Steelers are going to win the Super Bowl and Dallas doesn't have a chance......but our country is in trouble right now.....My only wish is this....I want my children and my future Grandchildren to have a better life than I have.......If Obama makes that happen ....great....If Romney makes that happen great.....but somebody needs to show some leadership....and right now ....I'm not seeing it from the POTUS.....he needs to get busy. If he doesn't ....like it or not Romney will win.
This whole thing is a mystery to me. I have fought some evangelicals I know about Mormons for years, because they claimed they weren't real Christian but a cult. Now they are going to crawl in bed with this one. Go figure?
Drilly, I'm glad that you didn't sound like the usual broken record. No baby talk on replay. "Failed presidency", "community organizer", etc. There was no whine in my answer if you pay attention.
Seems that when you get off your redundant talking points, you get mean. That's not so much to be proud . A reasonable question from my Friend and you butt in with nasty.......generally uncharactorist for you. I'm disappointed, Drilly. I'm really disappointed.
TAP, All I can say in response is, if he wins, you'll wish he hadn't. He ain't no Ronald Reagan. Not that I am a fan of the "great communicator". LOL
Our country is on the path to recovery. Look what trouble we were in in 2008/09! Obama is getting us slowly out of trouble. Romney will double down on Bush's policies! Good Lord!
Obama does need to step up to the plate and hit a grand slam. That's for sure. I'd give a nickle to know where he went the night of the debate and who that impersonator was.
Maybe he touched the magic underwear when he greeted Romney. He got zapped.
@Kathe,
I apologize. Actually, I was out of the country on business the last week and am just getting caught up on current US events. I'm sorry if I offended you.
The cat reminded me it is time for bed. Goodnight all.
Goodnight India....sleep well.
Goodnight Kathe, Drill, Six, TM and xxx....let's pray our country makes the correct decision....Please....
TAP
@Kathe,
What I was reminded of while I was out of the country, is that Obama got his hind end handed to him by Romney in the first Presidential debate.
That being said, Good night all and let's pray that our country makes the correct decision.
BTW, Drilly, you ass-ume waaaaaay too much. I'm not a regular MSNBC viewer and when I do watch, there's plenty I don't agree with. If you care to know this.......Morning Joe is my second in the lineup and Martin Bashir is my favorite but, sadly, I rarely get to watch either one.........especially Martin. Guess I like to watch tenacity in my politics. The Ed Head bloggers that are Conservatives (not con-servatives, if people don't understand the distinction I make) like to see that too. These same people don't allow Fux "news" to spoon food them with non-news and propaganda.
Funny and sad that "you people" don't understand that you are the radicals and can't recognize it in yourselves.
@Kathe,
I ass-umed nothing, let alone, waaaaaay too much. I agree 'Morning Joe' is a good lineup of commentators. I'm sorry, but Martin Bashir is not.
Good night all.
@DrillBaby,
Obama did not "get his hind end handed to him".
Romney used all four of these talking points during the same debate.
Mathematically impossible.
Romney lied.
The moderator finally stopped Romney and asked him "did you really mean to say that?" when Obama started staring at the podium in disgust after telling the moderator that this is mathematically impossible.
Jim Lehrer apparently flunked algebra and had to be told.
The Daily Show explained about how Romney's economic plan requires leprechauns and wizards.
Crackhead....I addressed this in post 2.38....Please read and comment thanks.
President Obama let a lot of us down after a very lame Debate performance, but I am sure America will finally see the light...Obama should win.
robMe hasn't told any truth yet. Those people who lie about that, can NEVER prove any of that nonsense. His $ 5-trillion tax-cut for the 1%(sorry. $ 4.8-trillion tax-cut), and the idiots fall for that nonsense(lie).The "rope-a-dope" expose his flip=flops, and lies, now we must use them to inform those who can't do research or even read.
Obama will have the little he lost back soon, He was just saving some for later. Unlike Woolard having his desert first like a mountain man. Romney may have "Make my day" But Obama has "I'll be back"
Substance will always win out over style, or at least it should.
@BooCoo
Actually... Obama has both the SUBSTANCE & the STYLE. Robme has neither, and just temporarily LIED his way out of the hole he had dug himself into. But he will be back in the HOLE as Obama and Biden continue revealing and calling Robme (and his weasily little friend Lyin Ryan) out for lying to the American people.
We deserve the truth and we've already lived through the last LYING Repug administration who nearly destroyed the country.
I think we should never underestimate our president! He is awesome! I know he'll crush Romney in the next few debates!
Mr Obama has the momentum, and has given Mr Romney enough rope to hang himself. Wow did Romney did a great job of it. 27 lies in 38 minutes.
Yes, he did!
Yes and no way Mitt won over a large number women.
I agree.... only Repug women are willing to let their idiot men control their lady parts and health care. The rest of us will control our own thank you.
I think Obama has it. Romney has changed too many things too many times, and he went way over the top saying he would cut funding to PBS......then he wants to cut money to low income families for school lunches.....when I was low income, I could barely afford what it was reduced to, let alone put food on my table. Things are different now, but I am not going to take the Republican stance on the subject as though I have never been in poor peoples shoes. Better stop I am about to get on my soap box!!!!!!!
Motto on Mutt Robme's future tombstone....
FLIP FLOPPER AND LIAR EXTRAORDINAIRE!
You can also just interchange them there liars. r & r.
go Mitt1234 banned, re-reg of multiple accounter coffeedrip and others.
I don't know Ed hasn't told me yet? Hee hee..
President Obama will win.....!!!!
A 10! xxx and LOL
Unless America's sleeping it gonna be OBAMA!
@xxx ooo
Let me introduce you to "sleeping America"
The undecided morons who actually believed what they heard Mutt Robme saying last week. Mutt fed them a load of bull crap and they decided to buy.
In the next debates, both Biden and Obama need to remind people that both Robme and Lyin Ryan have signed a pledge to a Lobbyist that apparently outweighs the oath of Office they both WANT TO TAKE AS PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT.
Both Biden and Obama have to challenge Robme and Lyin Ryan to tear up that oath and disavow themselves of it, if they consider the oath of office more important. Otherwise the American people will know that it's Grover Norquist that will be in charge of things if they get elected.
XXXOOO, Looks like half of them are sleeping. They must, like Norquist, think a country can run without revenue. They will be in for a shock as the deficit rises and there is no more money to pay fireman, police, and teachers. Since the young guns in the house (such as Ryan, Cantor and others) say they'll refuse to raise the debt ceiling next time, our country won't be able to get credit. We will be downgraded for that.
They don't care. Their agenda is to starve the government and lower their taxes. A real recipe for disaster.
@India
But did you hear.... A Moment of Sanity occurred on Fox and Flunkies yesterday, when Ben Stein said that (from his perspective) that the deficit can not be paid off with spending cuts alone and that an increase in revenue will be necessary from the millionaires in order to pay down the deficit.
Ben Stein On 'Fox & Friends': 'Taxes Are Too Low' (VIDEO)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/18/ben-stein-taxes-low_n_1980540.html
Even though Mittster got a bump from the debate, I still think the President has the advantage. He has the TRUTH on his side, something that is foreign to Mittster and his cohorts.
he wouldn't know the truth if it bit him in the a$$. did you watch any of the state department congressional hearings today? its been nothing but lies for a month.
Barring any election shenanigans Obama has the advantage. Economy is improving, foreign policy is better, healthy security, protecting our social programs. He has to win!
Obama, based on truth and working for all Americans! If every vote cast, is cast based on truth and fact, Obama will have 100% of the vote!
well romneys bounce is over and things will even out by this time next week the talking points from the right/wrong side will be
The Polls are Skewed!
I hope and pray, you are right!
I hope the Dems focus on the FACTS instead of the polls. Too much money is invested in having a tight race. It is like the world series.
I think the republicans are more like a car race and they are close together when Woolard screws up again (and he will) the lot of them will end up in a big crash. Yellow flag while Obama gets the checkered flag!
Obama, of course. Mittens is on a farm, eieio, and on that farm they was a bird (big) eieio, with a lie, lie, hear( here), and a lie, lie there, hear (here) a lie, there a lie, eieiooooooooo!
Mitt was on a farm today in Iowa...the Koch Family farm. I'm assuming they are related to THE Kochs, but I might be wrong. He was out there spewing MORE lies to the believers.
Obama doesn't even know where his food comes from. He doesn't even acknowledge that farms exist or care about the issues farmers face.
You need to do your homework!
R & R (Romney & Ryan) will continue to lie about what they believe in .... In their case both are "Serial Liars" and dam good at telling US nothing ??
From ElectoralVote.com:
National Pew Poll: Romney Leads 49% to 45%
In a stunning reversal from a month ago, in Pew Research's pollof likely voters, Mitt Romney now leads President Obama by 4 points. In September, Obama led by 9 points. Other polls have shown that Romney got a bump from the first debate, but most of them showed Obama still holding a narrow lead. The poll was conducted Oct. 4-7, entirely after the debate.
However, aclose lookat the internals of the poll turns up something odd. In the October sample, 31% of the respondents self identified as Democrats (vs. 39% in September). Similar, there were 36% Republicans in October (vs. 29% in September). While many people believe Romney "won" the debate, it is extremely unlikely that 21% of the nation's Democrats changed parties as a result of one debate. So there is a fair chance that the Pew poll is an outlier that undersampled Democrats and oversampled Republicans.
Yep. I'd ignore the numbers. They are easily explained and America bought the altitude excuse for the tongue tied wizard.
president obama is ahead because lie,s will not stand.
Like Obama and his $4trillion cut... Lol. Funny how people reject the opposition's lie but accept their own liar.
so, Rusty, you're saying that Romney/Ryan are liars. Thank you for you honesty.
Rusty's opinions are based on half-truths..
Well, actually, they are based on the same fact checkers you folks are using. I just admit that both sides use a significant amount of spin doctoring to the point both sides said significant untruths. Other folks on this blog stop reading when the get to Obama's untruths.
Nosno- and I can only surmise you accept the fact that Obama/ Biden are liars as well. Otherwise, of course, you would be a hypocrite. And you're not, are you? You know what I'm talking about...