Ha Haaa ---- A- Kike-Is-a-Kike-Is-A-Kike !!!!! This explains robMe in A Tortilla Wrap !!!!!

Obama/Biden 2012 !!!! NOOOOooooooo Question !!!!!!

Obama/Biden 2012 !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Obama/Biden 2012 === Hands-Down !!!!!!!

I have a friend that owns 5 McDonalds signs the same filing that Mitt did. My friend told me that his regional manager takes care of the daily business. My friend owns it but pays someone else to run it. The DEMWITS can't understand this concept, neither can President Obama. Do you know why President Obama has never ran a business? It is because he couldn't, Mitt would be smart to let the world know that he is proud to be able to create a huge company, and that President Obama would never get a job their because he has no skills.

And Yet Another = Fairy-Duster !!!!! Ha hahahaahaaaa !!!! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

How is the Pixie Dust Working For You ????????

chemdmd,

democrats do understand that concept (paying someone to run mitt's business) and so does President Obama, but there are too many unanswered questions.

President Obama has been hounded by the repubs about his religion, about rev. wright, about his citizenship, about his birth certificate, and his college transcripts, and etc. they have lied about him in regard to raising taxes, in regard to gun control, they have called him unamerican, unpatriotic, i could go on.

and i will.

the conservatives had a meeting with the sissified frank luntz on the day that President Obama was inaugurated, and they PROMISED TO EACH OTHER to SAY "NO" to all of President Obama's economic policies (and everything else) in the interest of making him a "one-term" president. we have seen nothing but filibustering and obstructionism from the repubs in congress. the first two years all we heard about from repubs was "where are the jobs", while they were doing everything they could to slow the economy. since they took the house in 2010, they have been more concerned about controlling my vagina and uterus, and the vagina and uterus of every woman in the country (we are only having 2.5 children per god-given uterus), vs. moving the economy forward with jobs for the american people.

turnabout is fair play, and President Obama is doing to the repub party, to mitt romney, what repubs have been doing to him for the past 3.5 years.

i hated it when repubs hounded our President for his birth certificate, and when bush "swiftboated" (lied about) John Kerry". its nice to see the democrats get a little aggressive after the entitled and "special" mitt romney. karl rove and mitt romney and repubs are crying on fux news. too bad.

don't be so childish, of course our President can run a business.

yes, i am smiling :-).

Whomit, Well, I dunno, we mustn't forget, Bachmann, Cain, and Perry! They were scraping bottom all along, weren't they.

They rid themselves of their one good candidate, Jon Huntsman, because he wouldn't bend over to their insane policies and ideology. Romney's a #1 chock-a-bloc Panderer and that is who they wanted. They being Wall Street, the corporations, and the Brothers Koch.

India whats left of the GOP is cesspool scrapings, they purged the party of all the sane people and this is what is left.

India~ Speaking of Bachmann, have you heard her lastest idiocy? She claims Anthony Weiner's wife Huma that works for Hillary Clinton, has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood! My God, don't these idiots ever get tired of having to think up new lies to spread everyday?! We can't get rid of Bachmann OR Palin for the life of us!!

They're the herpes of the Republican party.

Apparently THEY Aproove of the Disease - hey !!!!!!! he he he heheeeee GOMERS !!!

Obama/Biden 2012 ---- ALL The Way !!!!!!

Is it just me, or does that picture of Mitt make him look evil? Oooh. It's the eyes.

When Romney ran for Gov.of Mass he had ads saying that he created 10,000 job's.Now it's 100,000 job's.He's content to take credit for job's created by Staples etal after he left Bain, but does'nt want to take credit for outsourcing and killing job's when he was listed as the guy in charge on SEC filing's.Get a grip b113.

Fairy-Duster !!!!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Only because you watch Fox propaganda station and don't know what is going on in the country, you are to busy hiding under your bed from those evil new black panthers Fox told you about. Guess what because of Obama you no longer need to hide under your bed because OBL is coming to get you Obama did what GWB refused to do, he sent in the military and got him..

Another Fairy-Duster !! ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

MD poor Mittens even the GOP are starting to turn on him.

Whom - Wonder WHY ?? Ha ha ahahahahaaaaa !!!! Duh-Dit-da-Dit-DUH !!!!! heheheeeeeeeee !!!

Mitt left bain in February 1999 in doing so he turned over the day-to-day operations to the management.

After the Winter games, mitt started the negotiations of selling out his stock of bain to the management team.

This took over 2 years, reason is the now going to be owners in this LLC are going to limited partners.

So they took their time over 2 years to get it right the 1st time, in regards of partners joining & leaving the company.

Now it is law and under the rules of LLC's and the SEC that Mitt had to be listed as sole stock owner CEO & managing director, until his sale was 100% completed.

Go read the rules of an LLC at irs.gov & sec.gov

Sorry but again you are wrong in fact now republicans are telling Mittens to come clean. Repeating your lies will not turn them into facts. No businessman would allow his name to be on a company that long unless he was stupid. Then there is the little matter of Mittens sworn testimony saying he was running Bain in 2001/2002 so he could run for office. So Mittens little damage control lie is falling apart faster then Cains excuses for groping women.

It Certainly Is Amazing - How these Goofballs Pluck Fairy-Dust Out of the Air - And Expect Everyone To Believe Their BS - hey !!!!!???????? He he heeee heeeee - GOMERS !!!!!

Why isn't Stupidita being called out for the re-reg she has become?

Ho-lee-cow.

Shush we aren't done playing with it yet.

India - Yeah --- I Do Not Know WHY Tyler or Sally Do NOT Catch These Goofballs - As Soon As They RE-REG ???????????????????? Isnt That Their JOB ???????????????????????????

well, don't forget, his campaign adviser said Sunday that "he retired retroactively". He's got more stories than a kids library.

L = Ha haaa Ha Haaa Haaaa - You Got That Rite --------- he he heeeeeee !!!!!

Maybe he'll develop a brain, retroactively. We can only hope.

Dont hand Us that Trickle down CRAP - GOMER !!!! - Yeah - Distractions --- OH Ohohohoo Distractions ---- REEEEEEAAAAAALLLLLLLLY ????

What's Romney's record? Four years as governor of a state 47th job creation, increasing fees, Romneycare, giving money to solar companies he had friends at that failed....funny he wants to mention Solyndra and for those of you who don't get what that menas the adminstration gave Solyndra no special anythings. Obama had no friends there.

CC - OH - They Don't Want to Bring These Things To Light -- NO - NO - They Just Want to Avoid these Things --- Just Like robMe Ducks and Dodges EVERYTHING --- You Know - Like The DRAFT and TAXES and Keeping and Isolating His Money That He ROBBED Americans OF - OUT Of the American Deficit Equation -In Multiple Offshore Account's - For Nothing Other Than Tax-Evasion Purposes --- hey !!!!!!

So you are slamming Romney for low job creation, increasing taxes/fees, government run healthcare, and crony capitalism...yet seem to see Obama as a better choice? Hmmm

I did see the new Obama ad (in fact Ed discussed it in a thread) where he talked about his accomplishments. Actually he just slammed Romney for outsourcing and foreign investments. Funny, he didn't mention anything in those ads about Fisker (stimulus money to create jobs...in Finland), his overseas fundraising adventures, Valerie Jarrett's line of credit at a bank in Bermuda, Wasserman-Schultz's overseas investments (foreign drug companies, State Bank of India, etc.) etc.

The problem with Solyndra and companies like it is the Obama administration wants to create an inflated market to prop up the industry...on the taxpayers dime.

The birther nonsense is based on a lie made up in the minds of some very insane people. Mittens Bain problems come from what Bain did and what Mittens hid. That you can't tell the difference shows either a very dumb person or a person who seeks to misinform.

robMe/bain capital is Responsible for Negative Job Creation/Destruction IN The USA -- YEAH - YEP !!!!!!

Not surprisingly you missed another point.

If you would leave this blog for a few minutes, you would realize that majority of people don't care about Bain and what happened years ago. They care about the state of the economy and the country moving forward.

The birther issue - appeals to a small percentage of people who don't matter.

Bain - appeals to a small percentage of people who don't matter.

Perhaps Some Day - You Will Become Conscience as To The World That Is Around You !!!! ---- Butt - I Doubt -IT !!!!! DUH-Dit-Da-Dit-Da-Dit-Da-Dit-DUH ---- Whhhhaaaaaaatttt ????? Just Cannot Figure it All out --- Hey !!!!!!

No the majority of republicans don't care about Bain but as seen time after time when people learn about Mittens and Bain Mittens loses.

was a rumor that Romney's wife had Romney by his ear yelling at him....when I say open your mouth, that's when you say what I told you....yank yank yank.....

His mouth doesn't work properly unless someone Inserts Money ---- What an Automaton he IS - hey !!!!!! Even Then His Mouth Does Not Function Properly --- What A GOMER !!!!

No I'm slamming Romney for never talking about his record and lying about his in those few instances he thinks bringing it up will get somewhere will get him somewhere and the general lying

Taxes haven't increased. The right wing claims of cronyism are thoroughly shown to be unfounded upon actual investigation and they do actually investigate

Neither of the two men created a government run healthcare system but only one of them is willing to mention that

If Valerie Jarrett or Debby Wasserman-Schultz was running for president perhaps there offshore dealings would be a problem for them luckily for those two women they aren't.

The right just can't bear to think of the fact this isn't about all people with wealth or offshore investments it's about one man Mitt Romney who's ruinning for president saying he has all this faith in America but his hedging his bets on other countries expecting that not to think that won't cause people to not have confidence in him. But anytime you criticize Mitt Romney suddenly he becomes the avatar of all these different groups, well he's no avatar or representative of anything but himself.

Now on solyndra that's the point of subsidies to begin with. But the congressional republicans want to use tax payer money to prop up an industry which is in no danger of failing and voted to keep doing it. Guess the GOP has given up on their self professed "all of the above" energy plan. Apparently what they really mean is "all of the above but only if that is fossil fuels"

The Bain attacks are working, they always do whether it be in the Republican primary or any of Romney's failed congressional campaigns. Every time he calls himself a business job creator for his work at Bain, every time the opponent attacks that with specifics like these and every time it works. Surprisingly Romney has yet to develop any defense to this even though this is always played against him.....I'm mean come on it happens every time that campaign might be a little inept. This fact that it is often used and always works to some extent, some greater than others, shows it does matter to more than a tiny group of people who don't matter.

Don't you get the idea that Mitt's entire reason he says he knows about the economy is his work at Bain. So Bain is his record of experience on the economy but critiquing it is irrelevant to the economy? If it's irrelevant to the economy then that would mean Romney has no economic experience he claims he has.

If birtherism only appealed to a tiny group of people who don't matter why did Donald Trump climb the polls in GOP politics when he started talking about it? Now he's some right wing extremist superstar? Why? Why do Representatives keep trying to play it? If it only matters to a small group of people why are republican politicians still playing with it 3.5 years later? I'd like to think it only matters to a small group but sadly it seems to not be as true as we would like.

The Loose Cannon appeals to a small percentage of people who don't matter.

Ha Haaaa - cannon Doesnt even Know What Direction he/IT is Pointed In - Ha Haaaa !!!!!! GOMER

C'mon Cynical, taxes haven't or won't increase under Obama's watch? Well, there is the whole Obamacare tax and everything associated with it. Excise tax on charitable hospitals, tax on innovator drug companies, medicine cabinet tax deduction, indoor tanning tax, cigarette tax, are all examples and that is just a start.

Why do you think Romney does not want to talk about socialized medicine aka Romneycare? Well, because it is a losing issue...why is Obama attacking Bain , rather than advertising his "accomplishments" like Obamacare. Well, because again it is a losing issue.

I have asked this before in regards to offshore investments that the Democrats claim to hate so much. Where do you draw the line? It is apparently a big deal if you are running for President, but they don't seem to care if they are an elected member of congress (to represent Americans), plus the head of a major political party (Wasserman-Schultz) or a close adviser to the President (Jarrett). What is shows me is that it just a political stunt.

Here is the thing with Trump. I don't think birtherism was his main selling point, I am sure he appealed to some people with it - not enough to matter though. People like Trump because he comes across as a successful businessman - the anti-Obama. Again, the economy is what matters. If birtherism was such an issue he would have had more longevity and more Republicans would talk about it...except for a a few people on the fringe no one else cares.

I am not saying Romney's record at Bain should be completely off limits, but it seems to me it has crossed the line to stunt. Think in terms of the general election...not many people are going to walk in the voting booth and decide between Bain or birtherism and that is my point, they will both fade into non-issues.

Awwwww how cute he has his GOP talking points to keep him warm.

Chris and MD/MI - witty as always, completely pointless, but witty. Of course I don't have the bar set too high for either of you. What is Ed telling you to think tonight?

Whom, you can't fool me - I know you can't read and comprehend a post longer than one or two sentences or one that requires any critical thinking or research. I asked Chris and MD/MI, but I would like your input as well. What is Ed telling you to think tonight?

Oh and Whom, you are always welcome to contradict me with any of sort of debate or facts. There is a first time for everything, right? Well, not everything...

Hilarious that you think anyone here respects you or anything you have to say.

You're like a little kid all dressed up in his big boy pants and thinking he's an adult.

Just keep parading around in front of that mirror.

Oh Chris, you don't respect me? That really hurts my feelings...I just wanted to come in here so you would like me. Too bad...sniff, sniff.

It is comical that you refer to me as the little kid, when you troll calling names to anyone you don't agree with...because you have nothing meaningful to say. It is funny you think you are getting a one up on me, when with every pointless, name calling post you prove my point about your lack of self-awareness and knowledge. Please read the posts between Cynical and I - we may not agree, but that is how adults speak.

C'mon Cynical, taxes haven't or won't increase under Obama's watch? Well, there is the whole Obamacare tax and everything associated with it. Excise tax on charitable hospitals, tax on innovator drug companies, medicine cabinet tax deduction, indoor tanning tax, cigarette tax, are all examples and that is just a start.

What taxes have been raised in Obama's term? Zero. You can not say taxes have gone up if they haven't no matter how one feels about that. People on the right costly claimed this happened and it hasn't so to say otherwise is a lie. It's that simple no politics necessary assessment of reality. You can argue not raising taxes was good. You can argue no raising tax revenue was bad but you can not argue that taxes have been raised

Now to Obamacare there is a penalty in it but no taxes. I have no problem with people not being to have all their emergency care paid for by us you should as well. In the right's quest to be 1000% against everything Obama related it advocating for freeloading. I have no problem with taxes or penalties or whatever context one wants to apply. Unless you've a got better idea to not have the people pay for the entire medical care bills of others....frankly just can it.

oh and FYI you do that things like cigarettes and beer have been taxed higher than other products for decades.....drug companies do more advertising and bribing than innovating they are the drug pushers we should be fighting. These companies are looking for the cure to AIDS or cancer they are developing newer cheaper antidepressants and boner pills. Hardly a major worthwhile contribution to society.

Funny you mention drug companies since Glaxo-Smith-Klein just got cited last week with potential crimes and have been ordered to pay one of the largest drug company settlements in history for off label marketing. This comes after already having to pay billions only a few years ago for other unsavory business practices.

And I be 'ya in a few years they'll do it all over again

Why do you think Romney does not want to talk about socialized medicine aka Romneycare? Well, because it is a losing issue...why is Obama attacking Bain , rather than advertising his "accomplishments" like Obamacare. Well, because again it is a losing issue.

Neither Romney nor Obama wrote government take overs of healthcare. If it was how would their be any for profit private insurance companies if government is now running everything. Doesn't even pass the simple logic test. In fact the companies helped write the law! Look around the world and you'll notice every single industrialized country in the world has a healthcare system vastly more socialist than our own and it isn't hurting nations like germany.

Remember all the various provisions of the ACA are incredibly popular with the exception of the individual mandate and all those numbers continue to increase. Nancy Pelosi was right, now people are actually seeing what is trully in it without the distortion fog of the right wing misinformation/noise machine people are liking it. It isn't a losing issue. Certainly not for Obama vs. Romney

And in fact Obama has been talking about the affordable care act on the campaign trail as well his a record of various accomplishments. You may debate the merits of any one of the aforementioned accomplishments however when has Romney talked about anything he did as governor of massachusetts? What's Romney's plan? He has yet to inform us as to what that is

When has Romney talked about his record? He doesn't want to talk about massachuseets and he refuses to elaborate on Bain. No one knows what he thinks or plans to do at this point.

I have asked this before in regards to offshore investments that the Democrats claim to hate so much. Where do you draw the line? It is apparently a big deal if you are running for President, but they don't seem to care if they are an elected member of congress (to represent Americans), plus the head of a major political party (Wasserman-Schultz) or a close adviser to the President (Jarrett). What is shows me is that it just a political stunt.

Well are Valerie Jarrett or Debby Wasserman-Schultz running for president? Have they refused to release tax returns or any other financial information to the public? What you fail to see is Romney is not a symbol for all people with any form of offshore investments people like to play into that too much helps cement the falsehood and false equivalency on both sides. No one alleges his overseas money is illegal but you can not deny his choices on them have been very stupid in this campaign. When you're running for president saying you have all this faith in america and you have money in common tax shelters renown for their opacity and people don't trust you to begin with it doesn't inspire confidence.

He brought this on himself just like the Bain attacks how did the Romney campaign not know this was going to happen....really...if Mitt likes to fire people so much he should start with his campaign advisors since they aren't providing good services to him by shooting him in the foot. No matter what somehow the Romney campaign always manages to hit the bull's eye on the campaign's biggest insecurities

Now to Donald Trump if that is really what people think than it is a sign a giant portion of the right lacks critical thinking skills. Trump isn't a successful business he's finaled for corporate bankruptcy two or three times now. What other issues did he ever talk about other than birtherism? He certainly didn't say anything intelligent. Trump is not a successful business man, he's squandered more of the wealth he was born with than add to it. Thus I have no other reason to conclude it was anything other playing games with birtherist obama denialism and hatred

When people walk into a voting booth they will not have forgetten things like Bain and birtherism. Bain is Romney's only reason running he needs people to remember it since his campaign only has a fragmented, vague message based around it. When people walk into the booth they will also be making character judgement. Many and well most right and left have little respect for Romney's character. He has not given people any reason to believe in him and so no matter how bad the economy could ever be, Weimar Republic territory, even then he will have a hard time winning. People want someone with a backbone. Mitt and the GOP's failure to just stop playing with birtherism in any fashion and to call it out when they see for many shows a lack of character qualities. People are thinking these guys are too afraid to laugh at the crazies and instead issue these long winded sort of half cocked remarks about how they take him at his word...which sounds like nothing but if someone asked you if you believed nonsense like this if you were really so against it wouldn't you have just said "no"?

So, you think (falsely) that since none of the tax increases that Obama has rubber stamped have taken effect that he has not raised taxes? I just bought a new house (signed all the paperwork) but I have not yet moved in...therefore I did not buy a new house?

I am aware that tobacco products and alcohol have been taxed for a long time...that does not mean that increasing taxes on them is somehow not a tax hike.

I always find it funny that the party of entitlements is now claiming that Obamacare is about "personal responsibilty." It is a loser...why isn't Obama advertising this big accomplishment, instead of attacking Bain?

So, I assume by your statement about Wasserman-Schultz and Jarrett that you really don't care about overseas investments, outsourcing, etc. by elected officials (or in Jarrett's case those who work closely with elected officials) as long as they are not running for President? Or if they are part of the party your support? My problem is the huge hypocrisy. Like I said before your limousine liberals don't care about Romney's money, they do the same things...they just use it to con the uninformed voter.

I just walked by a Trump building in NYC, I saw he just opened a brand new golf resort in Scotland, to name a few of his accomplishments..get real that he isn't a successful businessman...every successful business or business person has failures. People want to see someone with business success like a Trump or Romney, rather than someone with no business experience like Obama.

You are fooling yourself if you think people's main thoughts walking into the voting booth this November are Bain and birtherism. People care about the economy...you may think Romney's message now is vague, but you seem to forgot Obama's record is real and he can't run away from it. Obama has done nothing but blame others...and you say voters want someone with a backbone.

So, you think (falsely) that since none of the tax increases that Obama has rubber stamped have taken effect that he has not raised taxes? I just bought a new house (signed all the paperwork) but I have not yet moved in...therefore I did not buy a new house?

And these taxes are? Who's paying more in federal income taxes? Again you can argue he should or should not raise taxes but you can't argue he has. Who will be paying more in federal income taxes in Obama's plan that isn't as of yet law?

Cigarette taxes how many people will experience that? You know that in our system of refference and debate we don't lump these things to the forfront as if they are analgous to corporate or income taxes.

Taxes you don't have to pay aren't taxes. Who has to drink, smoke or tan? Who is forcing people to make that decision? Conservatives have never once protested taxes or increased fees on either one of those products?

Tax are things you have no choice to pay. Quick question so should we lower user fees on these things? Is that something that'll help society? Just asking.

I always find it funny that the party of entitlements is now claiming that Obamacare is about "personal responsibilty." It is a loser...why isn't Obama advertising this big accomplishment, instead of attacking Bain?

Don't read much do you I just said he is talking about the ACA because well...he is.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5zU1y_0Geo&feature=related

Individual mandate is a conservative idea you know that. It stops putting the public on the line for people who choose to not have insurance. Got any better ideas? Don't for second of your pathetic life convince yourself I care to give anyone anything ever. Could care less about most of the human race. I'm just being honest. Point is the idea is about personal responsibility so on what grounds are you attacking it other than politics. I support when governor Romney does it, Obama or anyone else.

Better question why isn't Romney going into detail on his business experience or romneycare? Where are Romney's accomplishments?

Even funnier I just watched a commercial promoting the healthcare act and urging people to learn more about it online

So, I assume by your statement about Wasserman-Schultz and Jarrett that you really don't care about overseas investments, outsourcing, etc. by elected officials

Nope don't much care about offshore investments by american officials, to say that is far too simple but either it doesn't matter much. I already told you that and you must have chosen not to read that

What you fail to see is Romney is not a symbol for all people with any form of offshore investments people like to play into that too much helps cement the falsehood and false equivalency on both sides. No one alleges his overseas money is illegal but you can not deny his choices on them have been very stupid in this campaign. When you're running for president saying you have all this faith in america and you have money in common tax shelters renown for their opacity and people don't trust you to begin with it doesn't inspire confidence.

Once again its got little to do with the actions as it does how it looks in the campaign. If you believe there is a potential to help the Romney campaign with this contrary to the only point I have attempted to make I would love to hear those ideas. Furthermore from you have said Jarret and Wasserman have investments in actual business it would appear Romney has money in bank accounts not really companies. His money is basically just sitting there collecting interest it does seem to be connected with actual commerce.

To not deal with this stuff early in the campaign or before the race was just a huge unnecessary political miscalculation. Romney has money in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Switzerland which accurate or not the american people instantly associate with tax dodging. These country's name evoke the term tax dodging for mot people you may wish to say that is not a logical belief by the country but it is none the less what people think when they hear those names. Every single one of his republican rivals said this was stupid politics so it did not take a public policy genius to realize this wasn't going to be good for the campaign. Romney was warned this was going to happen. Forgive me if I don't feel all that sorry he walked himself right into this one. He put the bullet in the other team's gun.

Perhaps if people on both sides did not unanimously agree Romney can't be trusted to do anything because no one knows what he trully believes as a result of all his drastic flip flops. he has a record number more than any other democrat or republican politician out there right now.

As you may read or more likely not because you already didn't read.....I have said that if Wasserman-Schultz or Jarrett were running for president than it would probably hurt them too. It's just a dumb campaign move political ideology has nothing to do with it.

On Trump he is a joke and is no where as successful as he claims. If the right loves all successful business men why no love for Warren Buffett or George Soros? They have money and you don't want them to run......You and I both know the right likes him because he's willing to say crazy things nad lie about the president. People don't care or listen to Donald Trump 'cuz he has lots of money it's because he will say anything just Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann.

More importantly I don't care how successful anyone is at anything, someone who believes seriously and continues to spread the idea that Obama was not a citizen is not someone who should ever be an the whitehouse. I don't care if we're in Weimar Republic territory and they've made 100 trillion dollars if they believe that they aren't someone worthy of the highest office. You forget character is a factor. If the Grand Dragon of the Klu Klux Klan had a quadrillion dollars and the country's finances were worse than the Weimar Republic and Greece combined are you going to tell me you'd be comfortable with that person being president? I hope not.

Once again you lie about my comments I thought were a rather simple argument guess not. So first I'd like you to show me where I said people will vote solely on Bain or birtherism. I won't hold my breath because I know what I did say is that people will not forget about those things they will have a factor. You may argue it is a small factor but it is foolish to believe that no one is in any way going to be influenced by something just because it is not the top issue.

Character, personality, temperament and leadership in fact do matter. When people vote for President they are voting for more than just a set of policy positions again Grand Dragon ya' people are going to want to vote for that person even if they had an amazing list of plans. People may elect them but they will not want to or feel good about it so those personal character things do have some influence.

If that is not true why does the right believe Obama's alleged lack of leadership will influence the election? Leadership is not a public policy plan or piece of legislation but it's still an issue 'aint it?

So Romney has not shown a tremendous conviction consistently on anything in his political career if it is not true why did all Romney's rivals mention that? There is changing your mind but I and most have seen little to nothing to suggest this is the genuine case with Romney. He has said he would always support a women's right to choose because someone he knew died in a back alley abortion yet he is saying now he was always anti-choice/pro-life, what changed?

If he'd tell people why he changed his mind and acknowledged that he did there would be no problem. Do you think it's a coincidence he was pro-gay marriage and pro-choice running for congress in massachusetts and that he has denied both those beliefs running in a 2012 GOP primary? That's just coincidence?

Romney has not shown a backbone and most GOP would say he has no core. Whether Obama does or does not has nothing to do with whether Romney does. At worst then neither of them have a backbone so no matter how you spin that it isn't going to help Romney now is it