Nno not william j. green again. and again with your unfounded lies. you must idolize fake news and the so called "NEWS" mongers

Faux news / propaganda is Rotten to the core = No-Sh!t !!!!!

What part of that add was not true? Go look at Media matters, the left wing fact check, and then try again at finding something false with that add.

Fox News add about President Obama. Funny. MSNBC saying Mitt doesn't have enough job experience to run the country. Funny. Ed Schultz and Rosie O'Donnell. Same person. MSNBC calling any other New Organization political. Priceless.

chemdmd its also funny that chris mathews and keith olbermann asked senator watson the very same thing before the last election about obama..to list any accomplishments obama had as a Senator..( check youtube for video) and he could not list one..even mathews was wondering. PRICELESS

And it's just as rotten on the left as it is on the right. I'll be happy the day they take Fox News off the air... as long as they remove MSNBC the same day. Both networks are ridiculously partisan to the core. The only difference is Fox actually runs a few legitimate CNN-esque news stories in between propaganda shows as "breaking news" while MSNBC abandoned all pretenses somewhere around the time Olbermann got fired for violating his contract and making illegal campaign contributions as a member of the press. Show me a time when MSNBC actually reported what's going in empirically instead of either talking about his right the Dems are or condemning someone for disagreeing with them. Show me a time when they report things without passion or prejudice as the news should be reported.

Yes, Fox is far too partisan in it's reporting. So is MSNBC. You want news? Watch the BBC. The rest of this is poorly acted theater for bigger fish.

I would say you're one of them. And they got you hooked.

fux news-the propaganda arm of the repub/bagger party.

Hi Beth D = What - you just wanted to show your avatar ???? he he he !!!

Im confussed they showed video of Obama saying he would cut the deficit in half. Was that video doctored and he didnt say it? They showed video of him saying jobs would be # 1. However after the stimulus it was heath care # 1. Did Nancy not say that about food stamps? Fact of the matter is its not propaganda when its true. So unless the videos were doctored its not propaganda.

Suzzette: You sound really smart: "fux news-the propaganda arm of the repub/bagger party." Do you graduate from playground name calling to actual adult discussions, soon? Will there be a ceremony?

It isn't news. It's propaganda. Brought to you by the Fox Propaganda SuperPac.

But then, it isn't any sort of departure from their usual format.

Facts are facts and I hope Fox News keeps pounding the politicians with them daily. Unlike MSDNC that edits video and distorts the truth by taking statements out of context, or simply ignores the facts.

I agree

You apparently misunderstood the point of the article. But then, you're a Fox Propaganda watcher, and think their infotaintment is news.

Well he thinks Hillery is behind the birther movement because chain e mails showed up at her headquarters from unknown sources. Cause you know democrats send chain e mails just like the tea baggers do. Oh good lord are these people a joke on humanity.

oh wacko you just cracke me up FOX NEWS IS FAIR AND BALANCED really

It's a well known fact according to many sources - left and right - that Hillary Clinton supporters initiated the Obama "Birther" movement because they were desperate to create a wedge issue once they realized his campaign was real and passing them by. I love the irony in this - a video from MSNBC! Again, the racist birther issue was initiated by Democrats and Progressives. You people! youtube.com/watch?v=KJU37U5_rbc

wack - excuse me - Who is making this a wedge issue ????? Tell US just Who is making this a wedge issue ????? maybe someday you will Think and Realize just what you Spew About !!! Maybe ???

Well of course but really you need professional help your delusions are getting the better of you.

everybody knows that MSNBC leans to the left-but they are NOT the propaganda arm of the democratic party like fox is to the repubs.

to stacy you are really are there with the right wing-nuts aren't you. the only ones doing the propoganda is the repukes and fake news. none of them would know the truth and right reporting if it hit upside their heads

uhm..yeah ok. and ed schultz has awards for journalistic integrity doesnt he.

MSNBC must have a clause in their employee contracts,

" investigate the days news".

" Put your spin , twist, personal politics ( as long as its far left ) on it and praise democrats no matter what."

" Look the other way when the editing dept edits video or transcripts to make events appear anti democratic, racist, or anti-women".

" depending on our station ratings, only mention stolen Fox News clips we air every ten minutes."

" when the spins get boring, impress on the gullible viewers the feeling that Bill O'reilly is actually Satan".

What about Martin Bashir, Rachel Maddow, do you consider them news anchors or hosts? Do you think they bring the real, true news to the public?

I think the article is about the network, not a "Post your favorite rant here" opportunity.

Check out "TV by the Numbers" to look at the Cable News Channel ratings each month and you will see what an irrelevant joke MSNBC has become based on their one sided pro-Obama perspectives. I think Chris Mathews still gets a thrill running up his leg when he sees Obama. America has spoken.

It is not a mystery to anyone on The Ed Show that Fox News is a political operation pretending to be a news channel. In fact, we're pretty sure most of the country is aware of that fact.

That is what I am referring to. Comparing one network with another. Of course MSNBC watchers don't like Fox and vise versa. I do watch both and they both have their good and their bad. If Fox & Friends made this ad, then yes I will say they are wrong. If they are showing an ad that someone else made, that is fine.

Try reading the article. Fox produced it, and is passing it off as "news."

IF fox and friends made this ad? how about if FNC made this ad, and fox and friends plays the ad?

fox "news" channel made the ad, and you can be sure that other fox news shows will be playing the ad, especially HANNITY.

this "ad" is completely in line with their stance as the propaganda arm of the repub/bagger party.

and with gretchen carlson's implants and legs front and center, we get another view of the rampant sexism and exploitation of fox's female "reporters".

another sign of fascism.

More the sign of a male audience.

Are we saying that the videos were fake? Unless they were its facts that they showed, Obama was caught on tape saying the deficit would be cut in half, Did he not say that? Did he not say that jobs was #1 and then spend the first year on health care law that is now in the highest court in the land because nobody read it. Was that not Nancy saying that food stamps were the best way to stimulate the economy. Im sorry but unless those videos are complete fake that is not propaganda when he was caught on tape.

Are you not a fool? Are you not a moron? Are you not a jerk? You've proven it many times over. It must be true.

Regadless of what I am these vidoes are facts and to call them propaganda makes you a bigger fool, moron and a jerk. Only a complete idiot with no sense whatsoever would call these vidoes propaganda. Its Obama on tape fools the tapes are real and they were show on MSNBC, CNN and all of the channels as well. He actualy did say these things. Nancy did indeed say that food stamps would stimulate the economy. So Chris you are a real idiot not to know these tapes are fact.

Well, they make trivial points.

Its video of Obama saying these things, that is fact We all watched it fact. Unless the video was fake its all true. Somebody explain why it not true, are we saying that the video footage is fake?

We've all read your comments. We can see you're an idiot. The facts speak for themselves.

I may be but I do know what the definition of propaganda is. Saying that the vidoes are not fact is propaganda, These vidoes show Obama actualy really saying thes things. So by you saying that these vidoes is propaganda in fact is propaganda itself. See you guys are committing propaganda because these videos were real. Im sorry but this is a fact, it really makes you look very very stupid to say that these actually factual vidoes is propaganda. The only way it would be propaganda would be if the vidoes are fake. So you can call me whatever you want facts are facts. Its not propaganda when its facts.

shut up

Another classy and informative response from the wacky left.

Another classy and informative response from the Wacky Wrong !!! what - Faux propaganda Sux !!!

I see wacko has joined the rightie name calling group. Still shows the empty air between the ears. But then, all his comments have done that. And just FYI wacko, MSNBC states it is a left leaning political network. The name Fox News states it's a news network. It has no clue what news, truth or facts are. It only takes 10 min. and some common sense to know what kind of people are on. Fox Lies.

Take up arms? Against what? Drones, tanks, and nuclear weapons??

from you pic, u look a tad trashy there sugar dumplin. Look like you waer a friend of maddow thirt too.

And once again the rightie can't think of anything so just start calling names. More empty air.

holy smokes..MSNBC really does have you brainwashed.." All they know is attacking people"??? are you serious? that is all MSNBC does!!

Apparently you've never caught it when they cut from a set show to an actual news desk and report actual breaking news. I can understand the confusion because MSNBC never cuts away from its own propaganda to acknowledge the rest of the world unless it fits into their agenda.

And as for who is worse? Why can Bill O'reilly and Jon Stewart maintain a comfortable antagonism bordering on something you'd see in a buddy cop show while appearing on each others' shows but I have never seen one instance (other than Sharpton who is more of a public figure than a TV host) where MSNBC hosts would volunteer to go on a Fox show to defend their points of view?

I suppose you like MSNBC..... the most liberal news there is, a buch of non Journalist.

And just how many journalists are on Fox Lies? MSNBC host have never claimed to be journalist. Some have said they are not journalists. But you wouldn't know a real journalist.

John Stewart viewers get more news then the Fox news viewer, sad that these people try to claim they are exceptional isn't it.

If they don't, who will?

the world will be a better place when MSNBC folds and the propraganda artists will crawl back to therapy sessions..what the rest of you clowns that fawn over it will do...who the heck cares...fall of the face of the earth..the rest of us will be better off..

whomitmay, yes they do. They also get more news than they do from MSNBC. I especially like how Stewart calls Ed on his BS when Ed crosses the lines of sanity and good taste.

Really? 89% of ALL media outlets are owned by conservatives. MSNBC is 50% owned by a right conservative.

But you never say why he was fired. Any clue or just want to irritate people? And just what does that have to do with this topic? I'm sorry. I forgot you just want to use MSNBC blogs to bitch about MSNBC.

Hey just proves that liberals have a good sense of humor. Doesn't mean they agree. No liberal in their RIGHT mind would support fascism.

The Democrats are DESPERATE to make the 'birther' issue and Rev Wright an issue again leading up to November as witnessed by The Ed Show forum and MSDNC. You don't see anyone in the Romney campaign bringing up this issue; only the left in order to *try* and look the "victim". Trying to take a page from the professional race pimps, aka "Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton" aka MSDNC talking heads.

Go see how Britian feels about the Murdock empire, Canada wouldn't let Murdock in their country, Fox puts palm trees in wisconsin in the winter and says look at the people for walker, only to be a video of a rally in calif. Fox won a court case in Florida that they can lie on their news. Google it, then believe everything fox tells youi. England doesn't. Oh and the fire storm in England just might have jumped the atlantic, Murdocks trouble just might be in the USA too. It's all there google it and read.

Uh, Keesha, let me clue you in on a widely known fact: FOX is available on numerous providers throughout Canada. See, if you watched Fox, you would know this. You can google the Canadian Fox channels, if you're ever in Canada. Just a traveling tip for you.

I have family in Canada and always watch FOX while visiting them in.... Canada. While COMCAST drops MSDNC shows...

Funny how you, Conservatives, love to point to the ratings of Faux News are stellar! Conservatives in general watch Faux News, almost exclusively. Thus higher rating for the Faux News.

However, Democrats & Independents (I am an Indie) watch a VARIETY of news channels, and listen to NPR, also, watch PBS news show. Which explains why the say, MSNBC, does not beat Faux News in ratings. We, the sane people, like to hear from all sides, not just one.

Uhhh: What supports your theory that Conservs only watch Fox? I surf just like you. However, my "Main" channel is Fox. I can tell you all about every other news show, too. From Meet the Press to the Ed Show.

Ratings are not based on "What is the only station you watch."

I still dont understand was the vidoe of Obama saying these things not true. Did he say he was going to cut the deficit in half? Did he say that jobs were #1? Did Nancy not say that food stamps were the best way to stimulate the economy? Its on video so unless its a fake video they did say these things right? He ended up not cutting the deficit in half or has he? So just exactly what is the lie in this? Sombody please point out the lies in this ad here.

Still confused are the videos fake. Was that not Obama in these videos?

Im still confussed were these videos fake?

Bette, AL Sharpton has been on several Fox news shows over the years, including regular panels with Hannity, before he signed a contract with MSNBC. How is that not bringing in a liberal perspective again?

I'd like to expand on what Bette (above) said regarding MSNBC being more well rounded than FOX.

MSNBC has Morning Joe in the morning featuring Joe Scarborough, a former Florida Republican Congressman and self-professed "small government conservative". They have associations with former RNC Chair Michael Steele and former McCain campaign adviser Steve Schmidt as analysts, as well as associations with several other former Republican notables. Until recently Pat Buchanan was an MSNBC analyst.

Their prime time talk shows (i.e. Rachael Maddow, Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell) come from a left-of-center perspective, but they bring in Republican guests and engage in constructive debate.

What about FOX? To the best of my knowledge, their hosts (Hannity, O'Reilly, Kelly, the FOX and Friends cast) rarely, if ever, engage in debate with opposing political figures. All these hosts have other conservatives on their shows as guests and the discourse is always a one-way diatribe against "tax & spend liberals", Obama, Pelosi, et. al. I don't watch either FOX or MSNBC because I don't have a television set, but I canvass Youtube to see what Hannity et. al. are saying, and I canvass MSNBC's website mainly for news (yes, they DO do news) and often visit the talk shows (Morning Joe, O'Donnell, Maddow and others). I am unaligned with any political ideology, so I can be fair when I say that FOX qualifies as propaganda, while MSNBC not so much.

The Five, the show that replaced Glenn Beck, has democratic strategist Bob Beckel as one of its regular daily panel. They have had Al Sharpton on more than one show several times until he signed with MSNBC as a commentator and Jon Stewart has been on Bill O'reilly's show several times (and vice versa.) They seem fine with booking a liberal guest when they can get one.

In fact, here's a secret... having controversial guests like that would equal bigger ratings, and therefore more money. I think they would be fine with it for just that reason.

Russel: You have not watched enough of Fox, then. Shep Smith, Cavuto, Megyn, etc. have a liberal guest EVERY DAY. It is rare to see a debate on a topic during any of these shows without have Both Sides. ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE HAS NOT WATCHED FOX OR IS LYING. I have Fox on eight hours a day while I work. I hear liberal's presenting their views ALL DAY LONG.

It is rare to see a debate on a topic during any of these shows without have Both Sides. ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE HAS NOT WATCHED FOX OR IS LYING. dee-bob #25.5...

i sometimes watch megan kelly and also watch bill o'reilly, hannity, and greta van sustren nightly.

o'reilly does have liberal guests on his show, most of whom he's able to talk over and bully. a few exceptions are princeton professor marc lamont hill ,who he once insulted by saying he looked like a drug dealer, cornell west and travis smiley.

fox many times has liberal guests that are still carrying the torch for hillary clinton, like kirsten powell and several other president obama hating libs, who put him down nearly as much as the right wingers. this is worse than having no liberal representation at all.

other left wing regulars such as juan williams and bob beckel can't debate their way out of a ripped paper bag.

tonight on the show 'the five' one of the short skirted six inch heeled women was going on and on disparagingly about how john edwards political career should be totally finished for cheating on his wife who had cancer. instead of swiping back with eye of 'newt' bob beckel throws out dem elliot spitser.

it's as though beckel and williams are afraid of pushing back too hard on the right wingers for fear of losing their positions.