Sure it does adam. The problem is because you tea bagging republicans won't even touch the topic we get side tracked into debunking the nonsense. Not our fault it is the tea bagging republicans doing it. Thank you for your concern but again you fail.

Well I'll be - mikafromcommierussia - is that you!

All dressed up like a progressive but steering the converstations away from any real meaning. Now that I think about it - all of your posts are just the flip side of a FOX poster. You are are good. I mean you sucked me right in. It was the

"again you fail" line that gave you away.

Had me thinking that you were a bud - boy you must have laughed so hard when I was helpful to you the other day.

Comrade, tovarich I've missed you.

now that I've found you again we can have good russian party #1FOX, msnbc ratings in the toilet. I look forward to sharing many enjoyable posts with you - I might even try to help you out now that I know who you are.

With much admiration

Adam_Selene

Sorry but projection doesn't work because every liberal regular knows me as me so your all wet. So what has that to do with Mittens bullying? Funny how that works, registering twice is not a liberal action.

So what has that to do with Mittens bullying?

what does Mitten's bullying have to do with the PResidency today???

Something the GOP lack a good moral Character, they talk about moral fiber but reality is they have none, thy are just like Mittens empty suits bullying others to get their way.

kind of like Obama bullying the only black girl in his school??? there's good moral fiber...

"empty suits bullying others to get their way"

Whom

It's about time you figured that out and don't ever forget it because we WILL get our way.

What I want to know is what you liberal clowns are going to do when all this bully crap and gay marriage crap gets pushed aside and you have to talk about Barry's record...you do know that this time around he has a record, don't you?

Barry is in economically depressed Nevada today right after attending a 40k per person fund raiser at George Clooney's digs. Maybe he'll tell everyone to bite the bullet for a while longer because he'll do big things AFTER he gets reelected.

Here's the episode of "bullying" from Obama's book:

Thankful Mom-3182614

I found the so called bullying episode in the box "Dreams from my Father" page 60

It seems Obama was 10 years old, and in a new school. There was only one other black student .....a girl named Coretta. She and Obama we playing on the play ground together having a really good time, until a group of children accused Obama of having a girlfriend. He was l0 years old.....wasn't sure what a girlfriend might mean.....He was defensive of the accusation and denied it. She ran away embarrassed as well.

Obama states......"For the rest of the afternoon, I was haunted by the look on Coretta's face just before she had started to run away. Her disappointment, and the accusation. I wanted to explain to her somehow that it had been nothing personal; I'd just never had a girlfriend before and saw no particular need to have one back then. I didn't even know if it was true. I only knew that it was too late for explanations, that somehow I'd been tested and found wanting; and whenever I snuck a glance at Coretta, I would see her head bent over her work, appearing as if nothing had happened, pulled into herself and asking for no favors."

So you repugs want to declare a ten year old's first girl boy encounter as bullying?????

Gee, CATT. You have no idea what you're talking about. Surprise.

They are a pathetic bunch, aren't they?

Yes, I found it as well, a playground game, and taunting by others.....No comparison to the assault that mitt committed.....How stupid can they be to condone this stupid action of mitts and compare it to a 10 year old boy who was dared to kiss a girl?

No wonder I did not remember it from the book it was more like when we were in school at l0 playing soft ball on the sand lot with the boys all of us with skinned knees and elbows from playing rough. And even though we might, we never wanted anyone to know when we had a crush.

What has that to do with Mittens bullying other kids? I was expecting you to find another right wing source other then the blaze to refute the wittiness's that were there when it happened with another family member who wasn't there, but alas the blaze is the only one telling the story of the sister who wasn't there.

The blaze runs a BS story and you claim that the story about Mittens is falling apart in your mind perhaps because in reality the blaze is not reliable or more then the tea bag version of the Sun. Only in the mind of a uneducated hick would that make sense.

Nope that was you at that rally seems that you tea bagging republicans are always the victims why I bet you believe Mittens bullied that kid because Mittens was a victim. Poor tea baggers once again show their true pettiness. Funny how you tea baggers take the most obscure thing on the planet and try to make it an outrage. Yet when people like Mitttens gets caught in their dirty deeds you run and whine and cry and whine and cry and whine and cry like the little children you are.

Nope that was you at that rally seems that you tea bagging republicans are always the victims why I bet you believe Mittens bullied that kid because Mittens was a victim. Poor tea baggers once again show their true pettiness.

nope. just dont believe MItt bullied him. the whole story is false.

again, whom, i ask- how is this relevent to the Presidential race?

All Robme did was slap around a liberal. We do that here 7 days a week!!!!

Yet again Whomitmay - it is you who do not stick to topic. Do you think Mitt Romney knows what it is to be bullied?

Yes or No

Why do you think that? You have yet to actually address the question.

I think he does know what it is like - it could be the cause for his inability to connect with others. Can I prove it? Of course not any more than you can prove he does not know what it is like.

The topic is pointless - that's why even the trolls were trying to change the subject. There are real substantive reasons not to vote for Romney that have nothing to do with whether he was bullied or not.

I am quite familiar with your past work - here you are a year ago

Why do you think the GOP has been attacking education and cutting spending on education for the last 70 years. An uneducated populace is easier to control then an educated populace. Education was key in ending the Vietnam war because the educated young people figured out that they were being lied to. Look at how easy Bush fooled them into cheer leading the Iraq war even though it was clearly based on lie's.

It was educated people who saw that Jim Crow law's were wrong. It wasn't educated people who got scared into buying bottled water, plastic, duct tape and Spam. Educated people aren't afraid that marriage will be destroyed by allowing same sex couples to marry. Educated people know life is a crap shoot and life is risky. Also educated people vote Democratic and not Republican.

#1.2 - Tue May 31, 2011 7:25 PM EDT

I kind of like it - now compare it with the liberal troll droppings you are now passing off. Go ahead - go read your own posts and compare the style and substance to that of the trolls - just the flip side - just as disruptive to any real conversation.

So naturally I wonder - just what changed you?

Other than occasionally succumbing to the joys of troll tromping, posters here will not find any "tea bagging republican right wing nonsense" in any of my posts. They will see that I post on the need for separation of church and state, the importance of federal law over state law, and the dangers of the Theocratic Right.

So again I ask - just what changed you?

Adam_Selene

I wonder if any of romney's five sons were ever bullied, are bullied any one else?

According to Ed we've had 25 months of job growth.

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

Where are all those jobs The NEW REPUBLICAN CONGRESS promised us if the RICH GOT TAX BREAK EXTENSIONS?
They lied again. We told you so. Posted from Yahoo questions.

Right. By the time Barack Obama was in office for as long as the Republicans have now had the majority in Congress, the Republicans were screaming that he hadn't turned things around. Why don't they expect as much from their people as they expected from Obama? People fell for the Republican line of bs, and now where are all the wonderful things they promised?? But, the American public is back to blaming the President for the economy. The Dow is about 4,000 points higher than it was when he took office, but this means nothing to them. It took Bush 8 years to trash the economy; it's going to take at least that long to get out of this hole, and I don't see the right-wing Congress doing anything that will help.

Mom

You got a tax break extension too if, of course, you pay taxes.

You're right about the Dow being 4000 higher. Can you imagine how high it would have gone if we had an experienced president and not a chronic spender in the WH?

You mean like our last president?

2008 Dow Jones Performance: Third Worst on Record

January 2, 2009 | about: DIA

One good thing about 2008 is the year has come to an end. It is unlikely the market's performance in 2009 will generate the same outcome as 2008, but not a certainty.

The -33.8% return in the Dow Jones Industrial Average for 2008 is the third worst on record. As noted by Chart of the Day:

[the below chart] illustrates the 15 worst calendar year performances of the Dow since its inception in 1896...Only 1931 and 1907 endured greater declines. It is of interest that major banking crises occurred in 1931, 1907, 2008, and 1930 – the four worst calendar years on record in terms of stock market performance.

click to enlarge

Source: Chart of the Day

http://seekingalpha.com/article/112937-2008-dow-jones-performance-third-worst-on-record

It closed in December 31st at 8,776.

"According to Ed we've had 25 months of job growth."

No, that's according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm (You need to add www. in front of the link before it will work.)

Because the Party of No refuses to work with Obama. They do not believe in bypartisanship. The Party of No's goal is to make Obama a one term president. Just ask Mitch McConnell. I'm surprised the unemployment rate is just above 8% considering the number of brick walls the Party of No has thrown up.

#194 - Great post TM! But yes, I guess to a desperate repuke holding Obama responsible for what he did at 10 is in some way equal to or worse than Mitten's being a bully and committing a physical assault at 18 or 19 (that sounds like what many would call a hate crime if it happened in a school now) Mittens repeatedly tormented a fellow student whom he and his gang evidently thought was gay. Nice leadership material you are there Mitt, were you the ring leader? I bet you thought you were you a real badass dude! Did it feel good to be a thug and make others fear seeing you? I just love guys that pick on others smaller than them, that takes real brass balls! A real fine figure of a man you are Mittens! But it's possibly true, Obama at 10 was probably as smart and more mature than the over privileged punk Willard was at 18! At least today this President is a proven leader, and the one who is looking out for the 99%, unlike Mittens who only knows how to dismantle companies and destroy jobs to make a fast buck, which he then wires to his offshore bank accounts to dodge paying taxes on, now that's real patriotic! Another big difference here is Obama isn't in denying anything, he wrote a book after all! But Willard is so gutless he's claiming memory loss and isn't denying or confirming anything. His mealy-mouthed answer was a pretty weak and convenient cop-out! I guess he'll find a way to wimp out somehow or pay his PR handlers to dream up a nice, pat answer.

I only want to declare that most of the people on this site are quick to believe whatever Ed tell them to. That they are quick to point the finger at the right side, and quick to make excuses for just about everything on the left side.

Except Ed wasn't the one who kept bring up Obama's book. Personally, I glad someone took the time to do some research instead of taking someone's word on something.

Pro.....read the #200 below.

funny, a couple years ago the president sais marriage was between a man and a woman. But I guess he's 'evolved'. HA!

I'll take evolving to regressing back to the 1800's anyday.

So you are excusing romeny?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQwrB1vu74c&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6yQudb8xes&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAm-AxvZTc4&feature=related

I guess you're overlooking Obama's flip flop on homosexual marriage. But I guess it's hard to see with the lib goggles on.

He has never flip flopped. He has taken a stand for all Americans, not just the elitist. He said it had taken him some time to take a public stand, and not necessarily because it is popular and will get votes but that it exposes him to criticism. But he is going to man up anyway. He thinks it is the right thing to do. Now let's see if Romney might man up and tell the truth for once.

http://www.youtube.com/user/whichmitt

Oh My.....

Not very nice.

But of course you know all about bullying.....just read your post....Let us see who makes up fake stories. Gee, mitt decided to say he did not remember and snicker about it.....didn't sound much like a true lost of memory to me.