Poll: Do you agree with President Obama's endorsement of same-sex marriage?
-
Wed May 9, 2012 7:39 PM EDT
— Filed under: poll
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead. (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul) |
Finally!!
Thank you!!!
I was so happy I got teary listening to him speak so eloquently. Time to WORK now to get PRESIDENT Obama re-elected!
Yes, it is time to get to WORK AND GET PRESIDENT OBAMA RE-ELECTED. WE HAVE TO!!!!!!
I was so disappoints years ago when Clinton would only come up with don't ask, don't tell. Wow, Obama is an impressive man......He is my hero. Stand up and change things.....
YES, YES, and YES!
Tell the president.....
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
This decision is not political, IMO, as the President is so popular with the LGBT community. What might happen is he may get a few gay r/tp's and their families votes.
Now if Obama would only admit that he is a socialist, then Romey could start moving in.
Equal rights because of an anal fixation ! A mouth is a mouth, a rear is a rear ! Sorry, but this is really sick !
reagan,
with all due respect, not all gay men have anal sex, they have oral sex. many married men have anal sex with their wives IF their wives will let them do it.
what President Obama said yesterday is not only for gays, BUT FOR LESBIANS. i really doubt it if most lesbians have an anal fixation, but if they do, THAT IS THEIR BUSINESS, and it is not up to me to judge them for how they feel.
do you enjoy being ignorant? just because gays and lesbians have feelings that YOU DON'T LIKE OR UNDERSTAND doesn't make them "sick" or sub-human.
I do not consider them to be sub-human. They should enjoy every right except the right of marriage. Civil unions are fine. I don't care what anyone does behind closed doors.
The ban on gays serving openly in the military should be reinstituted. Civil unions yes, mariage no.
How could I know if I enjoyed being ignorant or not, I am not ignorant ! Suzette, just curious, how do you know so much about what people do in their bedrooms ?
i think people fail to realize that what happened in n.c was not a vote just about gays it was also about people who are living in common-law "man and woman" and also those who have children that are not married they can deny the children of these people health care and women will be denied help if they have been abused by a person they live with be careful what you ask for and for black people who are upset think about equality for who
listen reagan,
you are the one who brought up the "anal fixation", not me. when i read your ignorant post, i thought this would be a "teachable moment" for you (kidding).
i understand there is little opportunity for enlightenment for those of you who feel that gays and lesbians should be dehumanized, that they should be kept in their place. i think you should let god be the judge of us all, and not just pick on the sex lives of homosexuals.
of course you think they are sub-human, of course you believe their life style is a choice, (it is NOT), but more importantly you believe it is a SIN, and one that should be punished by by not giving them equal rights under the law.
you do care what homosexuals do behind closed doors, or you wouldn't refer to them as SICK. if you truly did not care what people do behind closed doors, you wouldn't say, they should enjoy every right except the right of marriage. civil unions are fine. i don't care what anyone does behind closed doors. you also wouldn't say, the ban on gays serving openly in the military should be reinstituted.
i hope you realize that this is the civil rights issue of our time. i don't understand how your god tells you that homosexuals are not worthy of marriage, or of every other civil right that we have under the law. what you are saying is just another example of how repubs like to dehumanize and exclude certain people from the civil rights that we take for granted, and they don't even care how they say it, and they will do everything they can to stop gays (and other minorities) from having human rights.
i have gay friends. we do not talk about sex all the time, but if i have a question about certain things, i will ask. i can't do that with all my gay friends, but those who feel comfortable talking about sex, and other aspects of their relationship, i am curious. i like to know what makes people tick, and if they know why they have the feelings they do, i am interested in hearing about it.
they teach this stuff in sociology. some of it i learned from sharing in the classroom, other stuff i learned through personal conversations with my gay friends.
thank god for president Obama
Yes !!!!
Yes we can and Yes we will again...
It is never to late to wake up and start giving everyone their rights....The reps claim they stand on the constitution....and Obama lives it.
To Thomas Cargo (wanted to reply directly to his post)
Leviticus 13:20
New International Version (NIV)
20 The priest is to examine it, and if it appears to be more than skin deep and the hair in it has turned white, the priest shall pronounce that person unclean. It is a defiling skin disease that has broken out where the boil was.
if it is so unclean why are there so many priests having sex with little boys you better check your priest to see what is under that robe
If a man has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They are to be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads. Leviticus 13:20 The Bible is very clear on the issue and God's word is all that matters!!!
You mean the words "Let ye who are without sin, cast the first stone?"
Are you enjoying your cherry picking? You left out the parts of Leviticus where you should never eat shellfish, or wear two fabrics at once, or talk back to your parents, all of which are punishable by death. Better stop going to Red Lobster.
God's word my ass- they are the words of MEN who, if you believe the Bible, are imperfect beings and as such not to be trusted.
David H with the smack down
You're right anyone who wants to rant about gay marriage and has eaten shrimp should that shellfish down with a nice tall glass of shut up juice
So put gays to death......wanna who did that Hitler, Stalin, Castro....all the evil communists leaders the right claims to be against
The bible was written by man's flawed hand there can be no question of this. According to the bible the only documents ever authored in heaven are the commandments given to Moses one of which is thou shalt not kill. This clearly proves the flaws of leviticus. So ask yourself which one the bible says was written on earth and which was written in heaven.
Thomas Cargo, the typical conservative hyprocrite Christian. Use the Bible to spurt out hate, rather than searching within yourself to find peace and understanding for God's children that may be different from you. God is the final judge of us all, judge not and not be judged. Live what you profess to believe.
Dude, do you believe in the Easter Bunny, and Santa Claus to? Just asking.
The bible was written thousands of years ago and was edited by kings.
You no not what you say for you to hold that position is to say the Blood of Yahshua does not cover those who believe in him and love as he commanded and you are in danger by your own words. You need to study the Word and pray before you judge for you are ignorant and you allow your bigotry to blind you. The WORD say no man is righteous but by the Blood so you self condemnation thinking you are so righteousness that you can judge another is profoundly sad. As you judge so shall you judge-WORD. No man can judge another man WORD I judge man's heart not his deed WORD take the log out of your eyes before you can take the mote out of another eye WORD
Wow, so you're a Christian, Right? That means being a follower of Our Lord, Jesus Christ, Right?
So tell me chapter and verse exactly what Jesus had to say about homosexuals. I can wait for all eternity for your answer. It's going to be a long, long, long wait.
While I'm waiting for your answer, I'll be voting for OBAMA in Nov. 2012!
Thomas:: You mean has sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman and a woman and a woman and a woman? Or doesn't that count in your world? Ask Newt Gingrich about that-- he is the only one I know that can give you an answer. But I'm sure there are more.
And what about guys who kick their wife to the curb because she isn't the trophy wife any longer and take another-- a gal he STOLE from a classmate of his. That is permissible because it is a man and a woman?
And who the hell said that a man has sexual relations with a man? Are you in their bedroom? Or does that describe YOU?
Are YOU going to put them to death?
The Bible is also clear about adultery, it hasn't stop men and women who marry each other from committing it has it? It's clear about treating one another as you want to be treated, but it didn't stop white people from treating black people like they weren't human. The Bible says thou shall not kill, thou shall not lie, etc., etc. And while I do disagree with the President about same sex marriage, today he voice his opinion. But have no doubt that I still plan to vote for President Obama. I am still going to work my butt off to re-elect him. Because today I saw a good heart man speaking from his heart and wanting all people to be treat fair.
Get out of the old testament and try reading some in the New...stop your hating and try loving people that might not think the way you do
You might want to try quoting the right scripture. Leviticus 13 has to do with Leprosy. Nothing to do with Homosexuality. reading the Old Testament is like Republican only reading the parts of the Constitution that they like.
The Constitution all man is creative equal .Why would our founding fathers put this in if it is not true?
So, you don't eat shellfish and live by all of the rules as laid out by Leviticus in your everyday life? You would rather judge and condemn people for whom they love then work to see a world where we are all equal before the law?
What a sad and lonely life you must lead. It isn't too late for you to leave your bigotry behind and stand in love for justice.
If Man is created in the image of God than God is a man and God loves his only son,Well....If all things are to equal than the Constitution needs a re-write too "All People are Created Equal. No word about a re-write in the Bible though....yet!
Thomas, it is because of closed-minded, bigoted, Bible-thumping, judgemental people like you that give other Christians who are trying to live their lives by the teachings of Jesus a bad name. As a former pastor, I have one piece of advice for you: Go crawl under a rock and rethink what it means to be a grace-filled, forgiving, Christ-like and loving Christian.
What is it with Cargo.....he thinks that we don't all deserve the same rights if they don't fit into his ridged way of thinking. I live by the Bible and one of the best possible statement it makes is LOVE THY NEIGHBOR. Love them and leave them alone and mind your own business.
i would think the repubs would be very tired from all their judgement against gays and lesbians, and from trying to regulate their sex lives, something that is none of their business.
thomas,
your post #3.
god's word is not all that matters if you interpret it to fit your selfish and judgemental beliefs, and then treat homosexuals as sub-human.
i get sick and tired of repubs using the bible as a "prop", using it to justify hatred and bigotry instead of love and equality.
Thomas you have no right to force your beliefs on others. Live your religion, live your beliefs. Leave others to their own. Would you let people force you not to be Christian ? NO way. So why do you think it is right for you to force others to not be whom they are ? God and religion are meant to be very personal and NOT meant to be hatred and force and political.
They put the phrase "all men are created equal" in the constitution because it sounded good, and it was a reasonable standard to strive for, but not because it was true.
If we were created equal, my dad would've given me the same standard of living as Mitt Romney's, and my buddy's kid wouldn't have to put in 3 times the effort to get a job (because he's Hispanic) as my white kid.
The equality they are talking about is that all men should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness... but it never says they will be at the same starting point like an Olympic 50yd dash, nor does it guarantee that, by virtue of being an American citizen.
Anybody here think the 'tanning mom' is the equal of Steven Hawkings? Were they ever equal? How about Donald Trump vs Ghandi? Alexander the Great vs Joe the Plumber?
Well thank you for showing your tolerance. But the point is you have a right to your beliefs and others have a right to theirs. No one has a right to force their beliefs on you and you do not have the right to force your beliefs on others. This is the very foundation of our society.
For example : You have the right to be a cynical arse and others have the right to detest you for your ignorance and hate. But no one has the right to force you to be a decent human being.
Kelvin I'm always one to remind others that the word "right(s)" is of shockingly low importance to reality, you can say you have the right to live but it will not prevent you from being murdered so there is something to your claim however I would hope you can see how the law adopting that it's okay to treat people better or less because we feel like idea would be problematic for a free civil society
That is the foundation of the nazi jim crow position......if all people aren't legally entitled to cetain basic rights why not purge jews or hispanics if so choose? Why not treat women like slaves?
Semi-valid critique on society perhaps but completely insane legal concept
Suzette. Your post #3.19 is very articulate and accurate.
I love the odor of burning pundits in the morning....
I love the odor of people sharing their opinions in the morning. Smells like Democracy in action to me.
Kelvin Pinney, Clearly they meant that all men were created equal spiritually, and deserve the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I wonder what they would have made of same-sex marriage.
Chances are it never would have occurred to them. Actually, I don't think it would have occurred to my parents, who both passed away young before all this gay pride, etc. came about.
Myself, Hope, I like the odor of bacon frying in the morning. LOL
Umm hmmm. And the beat goes on.
I am so Proud of My President And Will Vote For Obama Again
President Obama has voiced his opinion just like those on the far right have voiced their opinion. While I don't agree with him I applaud him for giving his opinion. And, I know that he won't flip/flop like Willard would. Even though I don't agree with him, I will still vote for him and encourage others to also vote for him. He is a man of principles and a Christian.
BTW, if you are an evangelical Christian, I was wondering how you could vote for Willard? As a mormon he believes in plural marraiges and that Jesus Christ has come a second time already. Those two beliefs are not Christian beliefs. Has he given up those beliefs already? It seems to me that the Christian Right is so racist and bigotted that they don't care who they vote for; just so Obama doesn't win. Hypocrites!!!!
Interesting that you use the word flip flop about Romney when he changes his view on something but the Pres "evolves" when he changes his view. I guess Romney would have flip flopped on not closing GITMO and cutting the deficit in half and Obama would have "evolved". You are the hypocrit.
A Fed, that is because Mittens is always changing his mind, let's see, mmmm Let the Big 3 go Bankrupt and now "I Tale Crdit for them coming back!" Not that's a hypocrit amigo.
Or my favorite, Dick Cheney was against Gay anything until he left office then all of the sudden he "CAME OUT" and said it's OK to be Gay?!!!"
Just sayin' A Fed
afed
the President said himself that he was "struggling" with "gay" marriage, he said himself that he was "evolving".
when mitt "mitt-flops" he does it OFTEN depending on who he is talking too. mitt romney is a moderate. he has had to "mitt-flop" to get the repub nomination for president. he has "mitt-flopped" on virtually everything.
why do you think repubs dislike mitt and do not trust him? some repubs have said they would rather President Obama be elected again, than have mitt for a possible 8 years.
of course if romney can do only what grover norquist has said is needed in a repub president, all he will have to do is know how to sign his name.
I agree 100%. You can't say who you will love or fall in love with..... As they say, Love is blind..... Let people marry who they love!
Gays should be just as happy and miserable as any married couple.
Sorry Mittens, "sensitive" or "delicate" issue is irrelevant from a straight person who has NO CLUE what living for 50+ years as a 3rd class citizen in a nation that believes it LEADS on civil rights... You are a ChristiaNazi and YOU are going to lose "big time"...
#7
David in KS, We sure are hoping for an Obama landslide!
Romney won't get the gay vote. He won't get the black vote, and he probably won't get many women or young voters. That's quite a lot!
He sure as hell won't get my vote!
Of course, the way Mitt lies and flip flops, by November he'll be saying, "Guess it's time I came out of the closet, folks. Yes, I am a gay lesbian transsexual."
It is and would be and has been unconstitutional to prevent any people from life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Therefore, if same sex marriage helps to achieve this for some so be it.
Its the Koch Bros. and their dirty tricks messing with the poll! I had my ID ready! Everybody has the right to happy and gay! And if they want to get married so be it. But who gets to be the best man/woman?Let them eat Wedding cake!
I wish that singles had the same tax breaks as married, And maybe more! It cost more for one to live as its cheaper for two. And as long as I'm at it BIG & TALL costs more too! No breaks for that! Heck it takes more beer to get a buzz if your bigger! Quit picking on us BIG guys will ya!
No.
Ed I am an older American that agree with the "President"
we know science has added much to meaning of biblical texts! we need to use our brains, study the history, and move out into the modern and more loving world! God approves of transformational love...and the comes in many forms!! Go OBAMA!
The president supports same sex marriage. There are people upset, but when there are those like Kim kardashian and Brittany Spears who get married no one says anything. You don't have to agree with gay people getting married, but if are trying to argue for the sanctity of marriage....there is not much left. The show Cheaters, being allowed to be married while drunk off your ass in Vegas, marrying for money, divorce is at 52%...marriage itself isn't sanctified, but it the belief and behavior of those that are in the marriage that makes it that. Besides, any thing they do is between them and God. Who are you to say anything? You are not the final judge of their fate. Only God can judge.
"Only God can judge."
Yep, and the last I heard, God hasn't died and left someone else in charge.
I believe that we should be kind to people. This certainly includes the LGBT community.
I also believe strongly that God will sort it out in the end...we will be judge for how we treated people in this short time on the Earth.
this is just as inportant as LBJs position on civil rights!!!!
i love my prez.. i am so proud of him. can the repugs say that about ANY prez they have had???
repubs think they have something better.
they do worship their hero, the head of the repub party, A DEAD MAN, ronald reagan.
And don't forget the Almighty dollar suzette..
Not to mention that Ronald Regan is turning over in his grave about the direction that Radical Republicans have taken his political party : ' Right ' off a cliff.
Just like Radical, Right-Wing Christians would actually hate Jesus were he to be walking on this planet today because he would not support all their hatefulness ; The Radical Christian Republicans would actually hate Ronald Regan if they knew his true political history and because Ronald Regan would have nothing to do with them.
I wouldn't make that claim Hope, Reagan was an insane self centered self seeking prick who started the whole mess we see today, not just economically but he tied his trickle down nonsense into Jerry Falwell's moral majority's beliefs. It was Reagan who put god into politics for votes, a lot of the rights religious ties came from Reagans own lips.
I was being sarcastic and you are sooooo very correct about Regan whom it may !
Whom
Curious as to why you have this unbridled hate for Ronny. Did he do something to you personally. He is universally credited for stimulating an economy that created tens of millions of new jobs, a thriving economy as well as the end of the cold war with Russia. Calling a former President a pr... is really way over the line even for you.
Reagan and Clinton were two of the best Presidents in our generation as far as economic policy this country has ever seen. And remember Reagan had a Democratic Congress and Clinton a Republican Congress for the majority of their terms. Unlike Bush and Obama they found a way to work together for the betterment of the country.
Yes and that is why our country is in such good shape now right ? At least if you are a white, gun toting, right-wing, religious-fanatic, billionaire, America is in great shape.
Wow, quite a sketch there hopeful. I's be surprised if there were 2 people who fit that exact description in the US. What may be more realistic is the 75-80% of us moderates who comprise the majority in this country who want to see the Pres and Congress work together for the benefit of EVERYONE and who still believe this is the greatest country on the planet. And who don't subscrbe to the radical left and right BSers who always think they know what is best and are always bitching, blaming and badmouthing without any real solutions. Just sayin.
I am not a radical lefty just because I have the courage to name what is going on in this country with radical right-wingers.
President Obama has shown that he wants what is good for everyone in this country. Re-electing him is the HOPE 4 2102.
This blog his here exactly for people to bitch and gripe and joke and laugh and we present many solutions to complex situations as well.
But if you want to simply focus on people bitching about fascistic, radical, right-wingers who would rather destroy this country than let diversity be the rule of the day, then you may want to hang out posting your snarky, superiority comments on a different blog. Just sayin.
afed,
lets be clear about W. bush. democrats voted for many things that W. wanted. they may not have liked him very much, and they thought he was stupid and ignorant, but democrats do not respond to a repub in power the way repubs do when a democrat, a black democrat, holds the office of the presidency.
in 2006 when democrats took control of the house and senate under bush, this is when the obstructionism by the repubs and the filibusters skyrocketed. then, when President Obama took office, the obstructionism and filibusters went up even more, in following their pledge to each other to remain in LOCKSTEP against any economic policy that President Obama put forth.
i understand why you don't want to associate yourself with the presidency of W. bush, but keep in mind that the repubs voted YES on everything he asked for. they LOVED w. bush in every way. and while the democrats did vote with the repubs on many things, the repubs and w. bush are largely responsible for our economic downfall. starting with nixon on, repubs have left office with bigger gov't and bigger deficits.
the only time repubs worry about spending is when a democrat holds the office of the Presidency, and that is the only time they worry about the size of gov't. when repubs have power, they do exactly what they accuse the democrats of doing, except when they do it, they are on steroids.
ask w. bush who put 2 wars and medicare part D on the credit card. now you all blame President Obama when W. is responsible for most of it.
I beg to differ on a few points. I don't blame Obama for what transpired under Bush. Bush ran up 4+trillion dollars in deficits in his 8 years, mostly due to the financing of the two wars which at the time they commenced was supported by Dems and Reps alike. At that time there was a call by most for revenge for 911. Everyone seems to forget the mood of the country in the months following the attacks, but there was a call for war by most. IRAQ was a mistake but at the time it was supported by the country.
Obama did inherit a mess with the housing and financial market collapse and I think he also did the right thing at the time with the first stimulus and the bailouts. I also think part of the ACA are good, but a lot of it is bad, including the mandate and new taxes. What I don't agree is that he continued the massive stimulus spending for the next three years. The last three years of massive spending did not create huge job gains and just wasted a lot of borrowed money. That is my big complaint about Obama. And before everyone starts blaming the Congress for this spending, the last three years the Congress has not been able to pass a new budget so what happens is the Federal Government operates under a Continuing Resolution which in effect says that spending will be at the level of the prior fiscal year, which has resulted in the $5 trillion in deficits under Obama.
There is way too much partisan politics on both sides of the Congressional aisle and the President as well. You only need look back to the Clinton Administration and the Republican Congress for an example of the different parties working together for the good of the country and doing it in a way that balanced the budget and kept spending under control. I honestly don't know how the two parties can work their differences out but it needs to be done or we will soon be approaching the way Greece is. And nobody wants that.
the money that President Obama is spending now is W. bush's debt.
when the economy is down, gov't needs to step in and help. when the economy is up, that is time for the gov't to be "austere".
when w. bush was "annointed" president by his daddy's friends, the supreme court, the democrats didn't hold a meeting, even though they were pissed off at how bush won the election. the dems didn't hold a meeting and pledge to each other to block all bush's economic policies, like the repubs did.
you all say that there is too much partisan politics on both sides of the aisle, but the repubs are responsible for most of it. their obstructionism and filibustering every economic policy, hell, every policy has made it impossible for President Obama to lead. i don't like to give grover norquist credit, but he knew what he was doing when he got everyone to sign his tax pledge. his goal was to make it impossible for a democratic president to govern, and he did just that.
the repubs pledged to EACH OTHER to say NO to everything Obama wanted, and that is exactly what they have done. the repubs sound ignorant when they say "we can't do our job. no one is leading us". what a load of crap. they don't want to be led. they just want to blame President Obama for EVERYTHING.
President Obama wasn't the only one elected into office. we sent every single on of our rep.'s there to work with the President, and with EACH OTHER, and not sign pledges that cause division and make it impossible to get anything done.
the repubs are responsible for the climate in washington. President Obama can't even lead those horses to water, and he sure as hell can't make them drink.
Suzette
Come on now, you know quite well that Obama's debt is his debt and not Bush's. During Bush's worst year his biggest deficit was $450 billion which included the DOD budget. Obama has run $1+ trillion dollar deficits his entire presidency and that is due to the additional $900 billion stimulus that he got through Congress in his first year in office and which has continued in the form of Continuing Resolutions every year since. It's time to quit blaming Bush, Reagan, Nixon, Lincoln and every other Republican President for this President's spending habits. If he didnt want the trillion dollar deficits he could have vetoed the spending bill. But he didn't and therefore they are his and his alone. That's just the way the Federal Budget process works and its just hard facts. Sorry, I know its easier to rant and place blame on others but reality is reality.
If mitt romney believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman.The Mormon practices marriage between multiple women and marriage between little girls and old men this should become the headline of the political and social debatex
Thank you M Artha White, I was thinking the exact same thing about Mitt's church, and if they have stop that practice, it was only stop recently.
slack:
Mormons are not the only strange religion *or* with strange prejudices about people....gay basher.
Oh No ! NOT Peaceful Religions !! Oh the horror!! We must stamp out the 'new ' Peaceful Religions which are based on centuries old belief systems from societies like the Esenes, The Cathars and the Gnostics - which makes them not new at all.
Religions can not be peaceful nor violent. Religions are ideals, there are abstract concepts and thus can not commit any actions, they are not as influential on people's actions as much as anyone religious or not likes to claim
Righties claim islam is a violent anti-american religion. Islam does not support homosexuality. This fact defying right logic would suggest the opposite of what you claim Robert....except it's based on a lie.......
And fyi fundamentalist Mormons practice polygamy today in this country. Do you live some mountain cave? Warren Jeffs, Sister Wives television show? Never heard of either, seriously?
Abuse of animals is illegal and will remain such. I shall now show how the neo-conservative slippery slope argument can be nullified in a very easy fashion: two consenting adults
Yes and slander and libel are against the law, no to mention reprehensible. But people still do these things as well. Passing judgement against people we do not know the whole truth about is about as against due process as it gets. But everyone does it. Although the fact that everyone does it still does not make it right.
The point is, no one can force you to believe the way they do and you cannot force others to believe like you do.
You cant profess to be for equality for all then discriminate through disparate treatment for others who are different. Especially those who call themselves Christains. You cannot draw others into the light with truth if you reject any man. The Bible says as you judge so shall you judge. Yahshua did not reject Mary who was a prostitute when the masses judged her instead he accepted her and he rejected the hyprocrites. Love will overcome. The blood covers those who believe in Him and no man can judge another man for the true Judge shall judge those by the intent of their heart not their actions.
Obama is a true leader. he will eventually be recognized as a visionary in history. The republicans are on the wrong side of history and will eventually be rendered irrelevant.
I am Catholic but even though personally I don't like it. I feel it is right they could take this to the supreme court and under the equal protection of the laws clause of the 14th amendment win because it is right.
You have far more faith in the Supreme Court than I and a majority of Americans do...
Look at "Citizens United" those idiots declared corporations were people! There is nothing in U. S. history more stupid than that decision alone!
Had it not been for this Court's right wing political and monetary ties to billionaires and corporations, this country would not be in the mess it is in today!
Trusting the Supreme Court with its five right wing puppets is a game for fools.
I was hoping he'd announce his support for same-sex marriage. I'm so proud of him.
No. President Obama has the right to express his own opinion. This is one area that I beg to differ with Democrats. My view point is we need to signal the next generation what is right thing to do.
Sen::: The right thing to do? To tell a group of people that they are third-class humans is the right thing to do? Your viewpoint is-- in other words, your opinion. Well, opinions are like @$$holes-- everybody has one. At least President Obama considers gays and lesbians as good as other people-- AS GOOD AS YOU THINK YOU ARE.
I think the President is signalling the next generation and this one we live in the "Right Thing to do." According to the Constitution of This country we should all have equal right. My Gay Step Son does not have to live a lie, and if he ever decides to take a mate, he can choose the one he loves just like I did when I married his father. I admire that OBAMA knows how to be "FAIR" and Caring.....about ALL the people of this country. NOT just a selected few.
Sen, as long as no one is forcing you to believe, think and act like they do, it makes sense that you do not have the right to force others into what you believe either. Why is this balance so hard for people to get ?
@ Susie, Thankful Mom, Hope 19.1; 19.2; 19.3 : Everybody has right to what they believe, I agree. No body is arguing about that here. Here, the question is what is Marriage ? Do you think for all these years our forefathers who wrote the constitution, abolished Slavery etc. did not think about this? Certainly they did and decided right definition of Marriage is union between a man and a woman. You can name it as civil liberty or whatever but Marriage should be between a Man and a Woman.
Well then that is what marriage is in your world Sen and that is okay. But that isn't what marriage is to some others in our country. No one is telling you not to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. What people are asking you to do is to respect the civil rights of others who believe in Marriage Equality who want to marry people of the same gender because marriage to them covers all orientations.
Hope 19.5 : All are respecting civil rights of others. For to be equality in marriage not necessarily the same word has to be used. Everybody is citizens, people who are born here are first class citizen, people come here from other country and later become citizen is second class citizens. Both have equality in citizenship only name is different. Thats what should happen here, we should call it civil union or whateverand not marriage.
It is about time that Obama did so---now--may he take off the kit gloves, ditch the Marquis of Queensbury rules and start to fight back against the right wingers when it comes to matters of essential freedoms and democracy by pointing out very clearly that if it were not for the fact that blacks and other racial/ethnic minorities, women and GLBT people had been denied all of the rights due them as American citizens, then there would never have been any need for them to get "special rights" as the rightwingers like to put it. I guess that when it comes to gays---assuming the always quoted figure that ten percent of our population is "gay"--then that comes out to roughly 30,000,000 Americans are "gay"--then I guess to them that its OK that this significant number of American citizens would have their full panoply of rights denied them---that hardly seems that they can really claim themselves the great arbiters of what it means to be an American and are the defenders of the faith when it comes to "essential liberties" as our Founding Fathers might have said---it makes a lie of such claims that they would deny essential and primary freedoms to such a large swath of our population!!
listen to what he said this is not a federal issue it is his personal oppion
@mike bulger, RE:
If you really heard what he said, it's not merely his personal opinion. He additionally indicated that it was a State's Rights Issue, not a Federal Issue.