The Georgetown University law student reacts to Rush Limbaugh's comments and reveals that President Barack Obama called her offering encouragement, support and thanking her for speaking out for women's rights.
The following statement was signed by more than 250 members of the faculty of Georgetown University Law Center and published on The Nation website:
"The undersigned faculty members, administrators and students of Georgetown University Law Center and other law schools strongly condemn the recent personal attacks on our student, Sandra Fluke. Ms. Fluke has had the courage to publicly defend and advocate for her beliefs about an important issue of widespread concern. She has done so with passion and intelligence. And she has been rewarded with the basest sort of name-calling and vilification, words that aim only to belittle and intimidate. As scholars and teachers who aim to train public-spirited lawyers, no matter what their politics, to engage intelligently and meaningfully with the world, we abhor these attacks on Ms. Fluke and applaud her strength and grace in the face of them."
Georgetown University President John J. DeGioia also weighed in on the controversy, saying it is important to keep the discussion civil.
"One need not agree with her substantive position to support her right to respectful free expression," said DeGioia. "And yet, some of those who disagreed with her position - including Rush Limbaugh and commentators throughout the blogosphere and in various other media channels - responded with behavior that can only be described as misogynistic, vitriolic, and a misrepresentation of the position of our student."
Leave a Comment:
Limbaugh could be the poster boy for all the eunochs seen in movies and tv shows, evidently doesn't seem to have watched Ms. Fluke at all, since everything he has said about her speech is a lie. There is a thundering silence from the Republicans as well as the candidates, giving Limbaugh silent consent to refer to any woman who takes contraceptives is a "slut". How low has Limbaugh and the Republicans fallen.
Thank God, only the far right wing nut think and act like lush.....I hope people everywhere who have any brains and are educated will learn what this kind of un-checked rhetoric leads to.
This started out as a conversation on womens health care and gop and luch have turned it to ugly and hateful. Women in this world in most cases are smarter than that, and I feel sorry for the ones who arent't. lush is trash.
If women who use contraceptives are sluts, what does that make the men having sex with them?
Johns or customers.
How can anyone expect a Jesuit university to provide contraception? Its like asking an Aushwitz prisoner to take a picture with Hitler. PSMNBC was just waiting for this one. I used to listen to Rush but he's so in love with himself it can gag you.
Wow, the freedom to use those contraceptions or not. What a concept.
The right (which is not) only believe in the freedom of greed.
Cavtrooper
Nobody is asking the university to pay for it. Only their insurance, which students purchase.
Cavtrooper:
A Jesuit university's insurance is to paying for contraception as an Auschwitz survivor is to having a picture made with Hitler?
Any Jesuit will tell you that is an invalid analogy in content as well as form. Wherever you received your philosophical training, I don't think it was Georgetown.
Georgetown U. is a place that has class
Denouncing Rush as incredibly crass -
Rush Limbaugh will get caught
In their whirlpool of thought -
It's not smart to anger lawyers, en masse!
If Sandra Fluke doesn't sue Rush for slander, she'd be a fool! The entire faculty of one of the most prestigious Law Universities in America will be willing to take her case, pro bono!
Actually, Sandra refuses to stoop to the lush level.....she stays above the fray and is forgiving and generous to the old buzzard. But as you see I can't be that gracious.
Rush did not call her a "slut" for using contraceptives. He did because she was asking us, as taxpayers, to pay for her sex. By our purchasing supplies necessary for her to continue her sexual pleasures, we become her Johns.
What is so hard to understand about that. Isn't a John someone who pays for someone to have sex? Isn't a slut someone who wants money for sex? Where am I wrong?
Aren't there any parents of college students here? Why do you people want taxpayers to pay this college student to have sex? Just asking.
I just had to open this one up to see how miss informed you are.......There are tapes all over the vine, tv, and other places and you didn't even watch them, or research them before you started defending this hateful ugly creature, Lush limbrain......A pity, you want to live in your tiny, narrominded, mislead world.
You only listen to Lush's verson and his comments. Or you would not make such ignorant statement as you did above. Lush's statement are perverted. You sure did not listen to her testimony, or any other informative information or you would know how WRONG YOU ARE IN YOUR COMMENTS. Now for good REASON you are back on IGNORE.
Please do not make a reply to my post until you learn something about which you speak.
Well, Captain America, it surely looks like you don't verify anything before posting. Listening and believing whatever the limbrane tells you could get you into trouble. Hint: Where does it say that Ms. Fluke is asking taxpayers to pay for contraceptives? BTW, do you know if healthcare plans for men cover vasectomies? Or, is that too difficult a connection for you? She should sue him for slander. What a classless imbecile he is. There is such a thing as guilt by association. Hm-m?
Capt
How the hell is buying insurance and, god forbid, using that insurance, asking you to pay for a damn thing?
Cap'n America:
A. Chemical contraceptives are not only for birth control. They also control ovarian cysts and other conditions -- which is what Ms. Lush's original testimony that started this mess was about. In any case, whether a woman requires contraceptives and why is a matter for a doctor and his patient and no one else.
B. Since you are getting to the principles of the issue, this boils down to whether health care is a basic human right, a part of the common good which we are all responsible for supporting (with taxation, if necessary), or whether health care is a privilege, like eating chocolate after a meal or collecting Fabrige eggs which no one has a responsibility to help anyone with.
By your post, I am assuming you think health care is a privilege, as Limbaugh and everyone on the libertarian right does. In which case you would believe no one is responsible to anyone for anything and your "freedom" is being violated by any requirement to pay taxes for anything you personally disagree with.
If any of that is accurate: 1. Prove to me heath care is a privilege and not a basic human right. 2. Prove you have a legitimate freedom in a society to refuse to pay for anything you don't believe in without providing rational argumentation to support your beliefs.
Capt, hush. You are making yourself look dumb. You know better than that. She wasn't asking for contraception for herself. See how uninformed you are? You asked, I answered.
And the pills weren't for contraception - they were for a medical condition that threatened her friend's life! As it is, because she couldn't get the pill, her friend lost an ovary...
But Cap wouldn't care about that...
Nanette: what was she asking for? Someone is looking informed, contraception "at no cost to herself" is exactly what she is asking for. What do you think she is asking for?
She was asking because her friend lost an ovary due to a medical condition she had. She couldn't afford the pill to control her condition and she paid a heavy price because of it. Not that you would care about that. All you know is what Rush and his ilk tell you. My daughter has to use birth control for a medical condition that she has as well. Not for contraception. This massive ignorance such as you have is very troubling. It is not all about sex.
If her friend has a medical condition, she should be able to get it for her treatment. Fluke was asking for herself and others because they wanted the government to create a new entitlement. Your daughter should be able to get her treatment through your health insurance. That is not Fluke's message.
I do not want the government to give my daughter (a freshman at Rice) free contraceptives. That is what Fluke is advocating, and I personally resent it.
I will agree with you, "This massive ignorance such as you have is very troubling." BTW, "It is
notall about sex." Don't you see that?Capt, you don't know how much I disagree with you. It is useless to even try to get you to understand. I am done.
You are right, we do seem to have different views, let's just agree to disagree on this one.
Got to go, taking some "leos," a school service organization, to clean up the Lions' camp for the handicap campers to come this summer. Have a great day, and God bless!
Capt. You are totally uninformed. 1)contraception of any kind for any purpose would be prohibited.
2)Please explain how buying insurance, at a very high price, and asking it tp pay for a Rx is asking you to pay for a damn thing???
3) IF you even tried to pay attention, she never once mentioned herself, but it was about her friend.
But why pay attention when you can spout your version easier?
larry:
1) I want contraception of any kind prohibited. I don't want the government to pay for any of it.
2) What? Fluke was asking for government to pay for her contraception medication. I have said insurance is totally different.
3) She talked at length of the need for government to pay for her contraception, so she could continue her sexual exploits. Listen to her testimony, her gay friend was only one of her many examples. Fluke wanted the government, through the "Affordable care Act" to pay for her contraceptive medication.
You need to "pay attention" - but then you would rather, "spout your version," wouldn't you!
Limbaugh doesn't have any children either because he used contraceptives, his ex-wives used contraceptives to protect themselves or he's shooting "blanks" It seems fair to assume that after 4 marriages to 4 different women, that Rush fondled that public sentiment would turn against him after he calls someone else's child a "slut"because she rattles the cage of the GOP in the defense of a gender. Sandra Fluke has a first amendment right to voice her opinion on behalf of women, without being labeled by "none parent Rush Limbaugh".
Pervert Limbaugh feels that any sex had from government sponsored contraceptives should be videoed, and he would be interested in viewing them when they're posted on the internet. I wonder if any of Limbaugh's ex-wives feel the same way he does? How Doe's his childless 4th & current wife feel about her husbands stated views on a woman's right to use them, ? If Mrs' Limbaugh is even allowed to speak about the subject at hand publicly, then again maybe Rush Limbaugh's current wife can't speak because she's too busy concentrating on holding on to the aspirin she's got between her knees.
It's called a joke, wfaison. Are you really that lost? I loved it! Of course I, like most other Americans, get it!
Capt, I think you are sick in the head. You like most other Americans get the joke? Good Lord! I think you had better climb down out of that tree you are in. The limbs are weak.
I'll vote for that......wish I could give you more than one. Then that would be voter fraud, Nan. Ha.
Lord Thankful, did you ever in your life see such ignorance? I have gotten to the point that reading such comments make my skin crawl!
Ever have a conversation with a scratching record, a stone wall, a fence post, a deaf person, an organ grinder, a stump? Say, did ya, Nan? I put it on ignore.
Must be referring to the Capt. USA. The Friend and defender of Rush. Now, what kind of a man would defend the devil?
Well he claims to be a church going Christian. Habitually listening to the gutter hate talk of Rush and ilk like him doesn't sound like a very Christian activity to me.
You can tell by his comments he goes to church for show. He sure doesn't put it into his daily life.
Those ex-wives have got to be in it for the money. I wouldn't let him touch me with a ten foot pole! Make that twenty foot pole. He gives me the creeps just to look at his face. That is funny though, with four wives and NO kids. There can only be five possible reasons for that. All the wives used BC or were barren, he has a vasectomy, or his little swimmers aren't that good at the breast stroke, or he's gay and paid the wives to pretend they were madly in love with him. Take your pick.
You guys are so funny! You admit not listening to him, and yet call him all sorts of names because he is standing up for the taxpayers of this country! Re-read these comments and consider who is doing all the name calling.
I just don't want my freshman daughter being offered "free" (at no cost to her, but paid for by the taxpayers) contraception medication through the "Affordable Care Act." This is a new entitlement that I believe is immoral.
Hey, I have very strong Christian beliefs and teach them to my pre-teen students at our church. Some of you might reexamine you beliefs if you really believe we should be encouraging college students to have sex by paying for their contraceptives. Just sayin'.
But you would be ok, if limbrain attacked your Daughter in this manner? Verbally calling her a slut, saying he wants to watch her having sex and then insulting her parents. I think not.
Limbaugh's remarks to and about Fluke are "over the top," but consistent with so many of his comments. His policy of "pointing out absurdity by being absurd" may not be understood by those who do not listen to him. Those of us that do (yes, I do listen occasionally, when I can) understand. Remember, he is the most popular radio commentator ever. Many of the comments on this blog site, like yours Mom, are very similar to his in tenor and absurdity, differing only is perspective.
Those very comments posted here point out why Rush is, and has been, so popular for so long! Think about it, and then let me know how I am wrong. Thanks guys.
So you are compairing the people on this site and what they said about a POS radio talk show psycho to Oxyrush himself? Thanks for the good laugh Kapt Klutz, I needed it!
I think Rush Limbaugh should have the advertisers listed,I would boycott every one of them. Sandra is a hero to women all across the country.I hope she keeps speaking up for them. Rush has some thing very wrong with him. He should be taken off the air.
She did so with "intelligence"?
Sandra Fluke is going to a Jesuit Law School and demands they provide contraception? She is having so much sex that she is demanding that others pay for her birth control because she can’t afford it. (Which she admits she knew they did not cover in their health plan, when she enrolled there.)
Besides the obvious, if you can’t afford it you shouldn’t do it, maybe she should say to the guy, if we have sex, you need to pay for the condom? If he can’t afford that as the price of admission, he’s a looser and she shouldn’t be having sex with him anyway.
She is opening herself up to ridicule and I think it is somewhat deserved. I love how this woman has said that the cost of Condoms over the length of her Law School would amount to as much as $3,000. She has a free scholarship but can't pay for her sexual appetite. Rush is getting crap for calling her a slut. Well, with all the guys she must be sleeping with to go through $3,000 worth of Condoms, to get her through Law School, I think he is right.
If you buy Condoms in Bulk, which this woman obviously needs to do, you can get them for about 20 cents apiece. That would mean for $3,000 she can get 15,000 condoms. Break that down in a 3 year law degree, 365 x 3 or 1,095 Days, that means she is having sex 13.69 times a day.
Yep, Rush is right, she’s a slut.
This is all just political crap being heaped out there by the Democrats in an election year to take the debate off the table about what is really wrong. Nobody has advocated that anyone deny any women access to contraception. In fact the access to low cost contraception or free is available to those that need it. This woman is a reproductive rights advocate, her self-description, and it is nothing but a political stunt. As well as Obama all of sudden mandating free contraception be available to students and employees of religious institutions. Then it is being spun that the Republicans want to take away a woman’s access to it. NOT TRUE!
Planned Parenthood and student unions already provide free contraception and you can get the pill from Wal-Mart and Target Pharmacies for $9 a month, or $28 a month in the seven states that won’t allow them to sell it below their cost. So this whole debate about not being able to afford it is BS.
Obama is deliberately stirring the pot when he decided to pass regulations mandating that Religious Institution’s Insurance companies must provide it, and provide it for free. Nothing is free. They will cost shift the costs by increasing the premiums to cover it. They don’t get it for free, the people who make it don’t do it for free, the research is not free and the costs for the materials that are used are also not free. The religious institutions pay the premium so therefore they are effectively paying for something they don’t want to pay for and when the Government mandates it, it is a violation of the 1st Amendment.
Dumb. You listened as well as Capt. NEVER did she talk about sex.
Take your troll ignorance elswhere.
Larry: reread the transcripts! You continue to demonstrate you lack of listening, reading, and comprehension by saying she is not talking about sex! What do you think she is talking about? Her friend's medical condition? Read it for yourself and stop listening to spin!
To Larry contraception has nothing to do with sex, at least that's what he learned on the WGE board
She did so with "intelligence"?
Sandra Fluke is going to a Jesuit Law School and demands they provide contraception? She is having so much sex that she is demanding that others pay for her birth control because she can’t afford it. (Which she admits she knew they did not cover in their health plan, when she enrolled there.)
Besides the obvious, if you can’t afford it you shouldn’t do it, maybe she should say to the guy, if we have sex, you need to pay for the condom? If he can’t afford that as the price of admission, he’s a looser and she shouldn’t be having sex with him anyway.
She is opening herself up to ridicule and I think it is somewhat deserved. I love how this woman has said that the cost of Condoms over the length of her Law School would amount to as much as $3,000. She has a free scholarship but can't pay for her sexual appetite. Rush is getting crap for calling her a slut. Well, with all the guys she must be sleeping with to go through $3,000 worth of Condoms, to get her through Law School, I think he is right.
If you buy Condoms in Bulk, which this woman obviously needs to do, you can get them for about 20 cents apiece. That would mean for $3,000 she can get 15,000 condoms. Break that down in a 3 year law degree, 365 x 3 or 1,095 Days, that means she is having sex 13.69 times a day.
Yep, Rush is right, she’s a slut.
This is all just political crap being heaped out there by the Democrats in an election year to take the debate off the table about what is really wrong. Nobody has advocated that anyone deny any women access to contraception. In fact the access to low cost contraception or free is available to those that need it. This woman is a reproductive rights advocate, her self-description, and it is nothing but a political stunt. As well as Obama all of sudden mandating free contraception be available to students and employees of religious institutions. Then it is being spun that the Republicans want to take away a woman’s access to it. NOT TRUE!
Planned Parenthood and student unions already provide free contraception and you can get the pill from Wal-Mart and Target Pharmacies for $9 a month, or $28 a month in the seven states that won’t allow them to sell it below their cost. So this whole debate about not being able to afford it is BS.
Obama is deliberately stirring the pot when he decided to pass regulations mandating that Religious Institution’s Insurance companies must provide it, and provide it for free. Nothing is free. They will cost shift the costs by increasing the premiums to cover it. They don’t get it for free, the people who make it don’t do it for free, the research is not free and the costs for the materials that are used are also not free. The religious institutions pay the premium so therefore they are effectively paying for something they don’t want to pay for and when the Government mandates it, it is a violation of the 1st Amendment.
You're a brain-dead, know-nothing idiot. Exactly the kind of troll that Limbaugh manipulates.
But why should the facts influence you now. They don't bother your hero.
Larry, Chris, and others: now I see your problem. Watch the entire testimony from utube, not Ed's edit. Here is a link,but google "sandra fluke testimony" for yourself if I can't get the link to post.
Fluke used several examples, her gay friend as one, but her objective is support of her sexual exploits through the "Affordable Care Act." Look it up and see why someone sounds so uninformed.
We did watch. You and limpbrain are the ones taking it out of context. If rush is the offended party let him bring on a law suit. The tapes will prove Ms Fluke in the right.
pfffffttttt
Also to address the following argument.
“She was asking because her friend lost an ovary due to a medical condition she had. She couldn't afford the pill to control her condition and she paid a heavy price because of it. Not that you would care about that. All you know is what Rush and his ilk tell you. My daughter has to use birth control for a medical condition that she has as well. Not for contraception. This massive ignorance such as you have is very troubling. It is not all about sex.”
This simply does not ring true about the woman who lost her ovary because she could not afford the $100 a month for it. First, Doctors have free samples they regularly give out for people who can’t afford it, Planned Parenthood also has if for free for those who can’t afford it, and in the case that she totally could not find one of these places to give it to her friend for free, it is available at Wal-Mart and other box stores for $9 for the generic. She also said that her friend can’t have children because she lost her ovary. Well, again that doesn’t ring true. A woman has two ovaries so losing one does not mean she can’t have children anymore, she has a backup. She is simply making up this story or she doesn’t really know the facts about her friends case.
My wife for years had to take birth control pills for health reasons and the cost as she said, was minimal and we did not have insurance to pay for it. So the inflated numbers about the cost of contraception that Fluke is spouting is totally inaccurate and I suspect intentional so.
Paul Carleton speaks the truth and the proof is that those responding can't refute his arguments they can only rely on calling him names. Regarding Fluke's testimony why hasn't anyone mentioned the immorality of her conduct and behavior? Are we morally brain dead? If so, Sodom and Gamorrah are just around the corner, and Georgetown University is a secular university not one with fidelity to the Catholic Church.
Jim, check my comment 9.2; they have been listening to spin and did not get the whole story. Their name calling stems from their frustration to not understand their erroneous viewpoint. Give them time to research their mistake.
You are the only spin we are hearing here. You go back and watch the full testimony. Not Youtube. Then maybe you won't be going off half cocked.
Goodnight guys, let me respond to your comments directed to me before I, like Fluke, go to enjoy this Saturday night:
RVI (4.4)
A. I agree, and has said that women needing such medication should be able to get it through their health insurance, instead of the “affordable Care Act,” the issue Fluke’s testimony was advocating.
B. We disagree, healthcare is a personal choice that citizens should be able to make for themselves, without government subsidies.
Your leap to saying libertarians don’t believe government paying for anything is ridiculous. I’m a libertarian, not an anarchist.
OK: 1. One can and should decide the level of health care based on their own convictions (hypochondriacs should get continual care, “Christian Scientists” should be able to refuse all. 2.I never claimed such a right, only that we should be allowed to discuss government policies that allow government to take from one citizen for the sole purpose to help another individual.
Littlepaws6 (4.2): I enjoy listening to Rush, believe he is sometimes over the top, just as I enjoy reading some (over the top) comments on this blog. Not unlike your own comments!
TM (4.1): This is not for you, as I am aware you have me on ignore. Can everyone see her comments are along the same line of Rush:
With examples like Mom has just given us (she has given us many more), can everyone see why Limbaugh is so popular. Her hate filled comments make me wonder if she isn’t a secret admirer. What do you all think?
Nanette (6.2): Thanks for your opinion of my mental state. 20 million listeners get it, your inference as to my place on the evolutionary chain may be misplaced. I like Mom’s voter fraud comment, let her know she is still OK in my book! Nan (6.4), maybe you need a dermatologist instead of a shrink. Such kind words, Mom (6.5), she’s got to be a Rush fan! Hey Nan (6.7), I listen to you, too.
Larry (6.8): What have is ever said that make you say:
Jesus himself conversed with sinners and publicans. Just what are you implying?
Hey, it’s really has been fun but (as I said earlier) it’s Saturday night. After burying my stepfather yesterday, my wife and I truly have an empty nest! Unlike Fluke, we have bought all the “birth control” precautions ourselves and, like Fluke want to enjoy the evening! Good night and God bless!
So we can conclude that a POS psycho fearmongoring racist moron is your hero because he pisses the SANE people off in this country when he vomits his comments every day? Like I said before, 'Birds of a feather......well you know the rest Kapt Klutz. And be sure to take your pic of Oxyrush to bed with ya so you can 'get it up'.
JiT: I don't need any assistance to "get it up," my wife is enough! Are you really insinuating that Rush's 20 million listeners are insane? With your "POS psycho fearmongoring racist moron" comment, you sound worse that Rush ever has. Think about it!
20 million! maybe 20 years ago, i say realistic 12 million and that's being Conservative (smiling).
he has been dropping listeners for a while now. and well he will lose a lot more now as well.
Kapt Klutz, I'm not the one losing sponsors right and left like your hero Oxyrush is, now am I. Im not saying Oxyrush's listeners are insane, lets just say they have trouble opening child proof medicine bottles.
The bottom line to all of this, if you can get past the ugly replies and uncivil debate, is that all of this is simply nothing more than Democratic Dirty Tricks. Let's create a topic that if you disagree, you can paint that person as “Anti-Women” or against letting women use contraception and throw in a lot of name calling on top. A downright LIE. Right out of the Democratic Political Play Book.
This was a well coordinated attack to take the heat off the Obama administration about what truly is wrong, the economy. Obama passes a regulation that will force Religious Institutions to pay for insurance to cover contraception, a violation of their Religious tenants and a violation of the 1stAmendment. Who gave Obama the tyrannical power to just violate the 1st Amendment like this?
This isn’t even about contraception because as I have said, you can find it for free or at a VERY low cost of $9 a month at Wal-Mart and other box stores. The Democrats pull this woman out of their hat, who was not 23 years old as originally reported but 30 and a long time Democratic Operative on Women’s rights. Then she is not only advocating the forcing of a Religious institution to violate their beliefs, a goal she states she had in previous interviews she went to Georgetown to do, but then in testimony to Congress, she inflates and exaggerates her claims on costs and misrepresents her friends circumstances as to losing her ovary and how she is now not able to have children. When free contraception is available and women have two ovaries, so losing one would not make her infertile.
Her estimates that a Student over 3 years of Law School will have to spend as much as $3,000 for condoms, her example, is what caused Rush to postulate, that the only persons who would need that amount of Condoms a day would be a Slut or a Prostitute. Who would need, at even the average cost of a condom if you could not find them for free, would translate into 3 to 4 a day! Who needs that many condoms??? Rush stated the obvious answer to that question.
This isn't even about Rush Limbaugh calling her a name. The left Talk Show advocates have called Palin, Bachman and others far worse with no repercussions. So it isn't that either. To cry foul on Rush, is nothing more than Hypocrisy. Really, this is the most important subject right now, free contraception for anyone who needs it? Why isn’t it free meds for cancer victims, diabetics and and those who have heart disease? Nope the most important thing is free contraception for students, who choose to attend Religious Institutions, for recreational sex. That is the most important thing we need to address. Give me a break!
The left has been trying to nail Rush for decades. For decades they have failed and for decades they will fail. Every time he renegotiates his contract he adds in another 50 million.
O'Reilly invited Sandy on his show to ask some questions. She declined but decided to appear on ..ahem....The View. It was an in depth interview...she like rhubarb ice cream and her favorite color is chartreuse .
Where is your outrage about Liberal Men who demean women? One of them being Ed Schultz who win 1st prize in this department.
1. Ed Schultz called Laura Ingraham a "right-wing slut" and "talk slut on his show and was suspended by there was never any out cry from the left about this. http://youtu.be/LLeGQr9TK6g
2. Bill Maher called Sarah Palin a "C*nt." http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2012/03/03/filthy-bill-maher-claims-he-can-call-sarah-palin-a-@!$%#-because-hes-on-hbo-and-doesn't-have-sponsors-video/
3. Bill Maher calling Sarah Palin a "Dumb Tw*t" http://youtu.be/MGE3G5kfzps
4. David Letterman says Governor Sarah Palin has a slutty look - http://youtu.be/vEvkOPidWkY
5. David Letterman made jokes about Palin's daughter "Willow" being raped by a baseball player when she was 14 at the time. He later said he used the wrong name and really MEANT to make a joke about Palin's 18 year old daughter being raped. I had no idea that rape was a good thing once you turn 18??? At any age, a woman's rape is never funny. http://youtu.be/cRM-XTgeb9M
6. Keith Olbermann called Michelle Malkin a “mashed-up bag of meat with lipstick on it.” http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2009/10/13/olbermann-without-fascistic-hatred-malkin-just-mashed-bag-meat-lipsti
7. Keith Olbermann attacked S.E. Cupp after her appearance on the Joy Behar show where she states her opinion on the subsidization of Planned Parenthood. The ex-MSNBC pundit tweeted, “On so many levels [S.E. Cupp is] a perfect demonstration of the necessity of the work that Planned Parenthood does.” http://www.theblaze.com/stories/olbermann-says-s-e-cupp-should-have-never-been-born-she-proves-necessity-of-planned-parenthood/
8. NBC's Jimmy Fallon introduces Michele Bachmann with song Lyin’ ass Bitch – drummer Ahmir “Questlove” Thompson calls it “tongue in cheek” http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2011/11/22/classy-nbc-and-jimmy-fallon-introduce-michele-bachmann-with-song-lyin-ass-bitch-drummer-ahmir-%E2%80%9Cquestlove%E2%80%9D-thompson-calls-it-tongue-in-cheek/
9. Montel Williams Urges Congresswoman Michele Bachman To Kill Herself http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2009/09/04/air-americas-montel-williams-urges-congresswoman-michele-bachman-to-kill-herself/
10. Joy Behar says- Sharron Angle is moron evil bitch who is going to hell http://youtu.be/pPrA4633rec
11. Don't forget how Obama made his joke about a pig with lipstick in a way to infer that Palin was the pig due to her joke about hockey moms like pit bulls with lipstick.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/2774494/Sarah-Palin-was-target-of-Barack-Obamas-Lipstick-on-a-pig-jibe-says-McCain-camp.html
12. Here is Keith Olbermann and his guest going on a misogynist rant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZK_0vmoIPI&feature=player_embedded
And so the left doesn't feel left out....
13. Here is Bill Maher discussing Hillary CLinton's "c**t and saying McCain is pimping his mom: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gyg31Wf18yc
Please don't make me find more because I can....